Jump to content

User talk:Ilghibellinfuggiasco

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luigi Porto (August 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Actualcpscm were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Actualcpscm (talk) 18:39, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ilghibellinfuggiasco! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Actualcpscm (talk) 18:39, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Actualcpscm, thank you for your quick review. It is the first time I write a contribution to the English wikipedia so I would know how to resolve the issue.
The guidelines on notability talk about reliable sources. I have inserted some sources in the link section - should I insert them as notes whenever something is mentioned? I tried to be as far as I could from "advertising" when writing about the artist, just listing some of the bio notes in my possession. Thank you in advance for the answer, Barbara Ilghibellinfuggiasco (talk) 18:52, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luigi Porto (August 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 20:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luigi Porto (November 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Wingwatchers were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Wingwatchers (talk) 01:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Wingwatchers. I asked for some opinion on the help page and I was told the entry has too many references. So I am reducing the entry for now, limiting the references to the most compelling. Removed the archive.org links that before led to archived uploaded material (i.e. scanned newspapers pages) and now got redirected to a general archival version of the website cited, as I see it is happening in many other Wikipedia pages where archive.org links look dead and unverifiable. The informations that I left on are all verifiable.
Please let me know if you have any advice, I am new to Wikipedia, updating existing pages is easy and of no effort, but this is the first one I am creating and plan on creating more (all of living musicians) but right now I am using this one as a gym to get to the right formula. [[User:Ilghibellinfuggiasco|Ilghibellinfuggiasco]] (talk) 19:07, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luigi Porto (November 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Eternal Shadow Talk 06:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luigi Porto (December 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Z1720 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Z1720 (talk) 15:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Uljhan

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Uljhan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:15, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Luigi Porto has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Luigi Porto. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 11:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luigi Porto (January 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mach61 (talk) 16:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Investigation of a Citizen Above Suspicion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Power. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luigi Porto (March 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rkieferbaum was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Rkieferbaum (talk) 13:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per the discussion at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_46#Piero_Scaruffi_-_Final_Verdict_on_using_him_as_a_source_in_reviews there's a very clear consensus here that Scaruffi is not to be used as a source in music/album articles in any capacity. So please, do not add his opinions anymore. It is a wp:self published source. Since this is a long running dispute, any contributor warned by the situation and who doesn't respect it, would encounter sanctions and could be blocked from editing. Thanks. You've been informed because you used this source here. Woovee (talk) 21:41, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Luigi Porto for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luigi Porto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luigi Porto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mach61 23:04, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]