User talk:Ijabz

Hello, Ijabz! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 08:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Horsforth has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bflickr\.com/(?:photos|groups|search)\b (links: http://www.flickr.com/groups/ls18/). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CVSNT Documentation

I've removed an edit you made to the article CVSNT

However, CVSNT is now distributed by March Hare Software and comprehensive documentation is only available as part of the CVS Suite for $152 USD.

This comment is factually innaccurate since no documentation has ever been removed from the CVSNT project (you can verify this by checking the repository history). CVS Suite does contain additional (better written) documentation, but that is nothing new (has been that way for at least 4 years) and other publishers (like O'Reilly) have always published 'better' documentation than open source projects provide. If you wanted to amend the article to list all the 3rd party suppliers that supply extensions/documentation for the article then you can expand the relavent section.

As for the other changes:

The author of the software and the license is already clearly in the article as a part of the 'box'.
The price of 3rd party products like books should not be a part of the main article.

If you wish to discuss this further please use the discussion page for the main article Talk:CVSNT

Arthur (talk) 05:40, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Jaikoz.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jaikoz.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)^(Talk) 21:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, missed this message - bit what do I need to do to stop getting a screenshot deleted. The screenshot is provided by me there are no copyright issues with having a screesnshot of the application itself, as for the issue of it containing coverart in the screenshot , isn't that just fair use. Look all these images used by similar software that also contain artwork in the screenshot

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Amarok2_1.png http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Screenshot-AlbumPic.png http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Picard_090_linux.png

Ijabz (talk) 08:18, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jaikoz notability

Please, if you really want this article to stay you must establish it's notability per Wikipedia policy. It's important that you cite reliable second-party sources that establish the importance of this application clearly enough that even a technophobic poet will recognize and admit it. If not, it's possible that this article will be deleted.

I removed the proposed deletion tag and explained my objection to it on the article's Talk page, which I believe will require an open discussion before the article can be deleted, but this is a temporary reprieve. The article's notability has been disputed for over 2 1/2 years now, and all it takes is one slash-and-burn editor to send it to Articles for Deletion for debate and demolition.

Believe me, there's nothing I find more frustrating than to find a topic I'm interested in missing from Wikipedia, and nothing more maddening to discover that it's missing because the Wikipedians themselves have destroyed an existing article, but as a practical matter it's up to you to keep this article out of the path of Wikipedian Vogons. Yappy2bhere (talk) 16:36, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jaikoz

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jaikoz, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaikoz. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Explodicle (T/C) 17:15, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You were on a roll with Jaikoz. If you don't want your good work to be lost, now is the time to speak up in its defense at AfD. Yappy2bhere (talk) 22:46, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albunack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Albunack

Hi,

Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I see you just created the article Albunack. When I came across it and looked for reliable sources on the subject, I wasn't able to find any at all. That would typically mean it should be nominated for deletion. Since it's so new, I though I'd leave this message instead for now. How would you feel if I moved it to the "draft" space until which time as you or someone else can find/add reliable sources to establish notability? That would mean it would live at Draft:Albunack. More information on Drafts here: Wikipedia:Drafts. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:42, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Message order on talk pages

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on Talk:MusicBrainz Picard were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. -- intgr [talk] 16:51, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]