User talk:Ihy34

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 10:45, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Nbcwd. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Korn because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Consider reading WP:OWN before you start making edits to pages and claiming you will allow something to be on the page. Thank you —Preceding undated comment added 02:33, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Evolve (EP) was changed by Ihy34 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952683 on 2013-01-11T20:08:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:08, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at System of a Down, you may be blocked from editing. – Richard BB 07:48, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Ridernyc (talk) 00:22, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ridernyc (talk) 00:24, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Plus, I have reverted your edits at Trivium (band). That's a Good Article and needs to be handled with care: you added material with references to unreliable sources and made a bunch of changes not in agreement with the Manual of Style, including putting wikilinks in quotes, overlinking, etc. Drmies (talk) 01:47, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- They came from noisecreep, blabbermouth and other newsites. those are reliable. Ihy34 (talk) 03:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - No, they are metal fansites, and there are other problems as well, as I noted. If you can't improve an article, and you can't tell a reliable from an unreliable source (see WP:RS), then maybe you should leave at least the good articles alone. Drmies (talk) 14:07, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Genre warring

I've reverted your edits to the WP:Genre warrior redirect because (1) we don't need 2 copies of the essay, (2) you can't just copy things without crediting the author, and (3) you can't just make it a policy by putting a category on it. 28bytes (talk) 02:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dot Dot Curve (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to OMFG, Booch, Kronik, Jump!, The Bomb, I'm Still Here and Converse

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Talk:Korn#formation

Hello, Ihy34. You have new messages at Talk:Korn.
Message added 14:35, 7 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

February 2013

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Reviews at teethofthedivine.com reliable. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You indicated that "those sources on christian go to the main page" which I do not understand. The first linked is AllMusic and it resolves to http://www.allmusic.com/artist/for-today-mn0000954009. The second is JFH: http://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/cdreviews/Portraits.asp and it doesn't resolve to the main page. Not sure what you're on about. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:22, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Documentation for Template:Infobox album indicates that

" Drop words like "Records" from the end of the label's name (e.g. use [[Universal Records|Universal]] rather than [[Universal Records]])."

See Template:Infobox_Album#Label specifially. That would mean we should list [[Facedown Records|Facedown]] rather than [[Facedown Records]] Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since "Christian" is a proper noun, and genres that start with the word, such as Christian metal or Christian metalcore, are also capitalized. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:31, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Curb Chain. I noticed that you made a change to an article, list of groove metal bands, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Chain (talk) 03:53, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving a lot of warning messages. Please make sure you are representing the source faithfully.Curb Chain (talk) 00:44, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have a hard time understanding WP:reliable sources. I am going to ask you not to put sources to statements that cannot be found in the source.Curb Chain (talk) 00:58, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the edit summary. I should have said "note".Curb Chain (talk) 00:58, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of screamo bands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silverstein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Awakening (Blessthefall album). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 03:21, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Faget (song)

Thanks for creating the article about the Korn single. I moved it to Faget (song), as the word Faget itself should be a disambiguation. Let me know if you have any questions. Jokestress (talk) 02:18, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Otep (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Babes in Toyland and L7

Need To (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mastering

Shoots and Ladders (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mastering

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ihy34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't even know what I did wrong, I never abused my account. I k now i had various accounts as i made this one, but they were BACK-UPS in case my other accounts were hacked/etc. The only time sockpuppetry is on various accounts is when it's used to avoid blocks. During my 24 hour block i didn't ever use my back up accounts. I just waited for the block to expire. But suddenly this comes up. Wikipedia has said multiple accounts are okay, as long as you don't use them for sockpuppetry aka avoiding blocks. The admin "Elockid" didn't give a precise reason on why he blocked me. Ihy34 (talk) 02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per Elockid's further explanation. Also, dirty sock masters don't really deserve further explanations. Syrthiss (talk) 16:28, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, it's also sockpuppetry if you're attempting to create a false consensus (i.e. your sockpuppets are all !voting on the same issue) or you're attempting to conceal who's actually making edits. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 07:40, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please disclose all your "backup" accounts. Max Semenik (talk) 07:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CU comment: Helping you guys out. If we ignore the fact that this account is a sock of a blocked sockmaster, 16 backup accounts is something I would call excessive. Note that you've edited from these backup accounts. Elockid ^(Talk) 12:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Make me famous

Hello, I'm Cindamuse. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Make me famous, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. While a source was provided for the contentious information, this source does not meet the threshold for reliability, since it was a statement from the band about their former band member. As such, this content is considered contentious and not appropriate for the encyclopedia. It is important that we always maintain neutrality. For more information about writing about living persons, see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Cindy(talk to me) 02:24, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ashley Purdy

The article Ashley Purdy has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ashley Purdy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ashley Purdy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:34, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]