User talk:Igorsova

Your recent editing history at Nationalism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -----Snowded ^TALK 15:31, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"...Conversely, radical nationalism combined with racial hatred was also a key factor in the Holocaust perpetrated by Nazi Germany..."

vs

""...Conversely, radical nationalism combined with racial hatred, socialism, homophobia and xenophobia, was also a key factor in the Holocaust and other crimes against humanity perpetrated by Nazi Germany..."

I strongly believe that highlighting only a certain part of NAZI ideology (such as nationalism) and thus hiding other important contributing factors of NAZI ideology (such as socialism, homophobia, xenophobia, supremacy,...), is misleading for readers, and presents them with a twisted image of complex ideological structure of this regime, and screens them from the real root, from which NAZI regime had grown. Theres no need to hide the fact that NAZI is National Socialism.

Igorsova (talk) 14:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Changes on Russia article regarding incorrect map

The main issue from my part is the removal of the useful visual aids in displaying the relevant subdivisions types of Russia, not the nature of dispute. I agree that the maps as they stand seemingly unambiguously showing Crimea and Sevastopol being part of Russia is incorrect, however instead of outright removing these maps entirely, it would perhaps be better instead to have the maps updated to quite clearly indicate the disputed status of Crimea and Sevastopol, while at the same time keeping the maps accurate to the nature of Russia's subdivision layout as it currently stands, as despite the clear stance of the international community, they are the ones currently administering the region, and such a change would more accurately reflect this dichotomy.

This particular method is already used in other maps on Wikipedia showing Russia such as in the articles on the Commonwealth of Independent States and the Eurasian Economic Union and so on, and as such would be appropriate here as well.— Nohomers48 (talk • contribs) 14:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The main issue is that the map of Russian Federation including Crimea is intentionally misleading and should not be on Wikipedia until it is corrected in accordance to the international law.

Igorsova (talk) 21:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed so, and it should be marked that the regions are explicitly disputed and not outright part of Russia due to that. I'm not really able to do such editing myself, but the users who did create those files to begin with are AlexWelens (talk), and so they'd be better to talk to about modifying the maps accordingly. Alternatively, as is already done on the Map of Russia in its main Wikipedia article, a note applied to the caption of each image also explicitly stating this issue, worded thusly:

"The Crimean Peninsula, claimed and de facto administered by Russia, is recognized as territory of Ukraine by a majority of UN member nations.[1]".— Nohomers48 (talk • contribs) 07:08, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]