User talk:Igorkrupitsky

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EmotionMachine.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:EmotionMachine.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- L A X 10:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This images is under "fair use" because is of a book cover. I used this image as my template. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Image:OnInt.png --Igor K 10:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Last Minute Book Report

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Last Minute Book Report, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Last Minute Book Report is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Last Minute Book Report, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

XMLA Consumers

Few reasons:

There are hundreds of XMLA consumers now. It's like having list of ODBC consumers.
Wikipedia:NOTLINK#LINK policy - There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia
WP:EL policy - which have the following categories to be avoided:

- Links to sites that primarily exist to sell products or services
- Lists of links to manufacturers, suppliers or customers

Wikipedia:NOTDIRECTORY#DIRECTORY policy
and lastly Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest - you are the person behind ReportPortal, so promoting link to it on Wikipedia is conflict of interest.

Wikiolap (talk) 21:15, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the list is not complete but I doubt that there a hundred of XMLA consumers. What are you sources?

Most technical product on Wikipedia provides a link to commercial product. This is what makes this article valuable. Without the link to sites to provide the technology the articles would be very dry.

Yes, I am associated with ReportPortal but link it to its non commercial open source product.

--Igor K (talk) 21:25, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]