User talk:Iglonghurst

Welcome!

Hi there, Iglonghurst, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm a regular contributor here, and when I notice on the recent changes log that a new editor has registered, I like to send them a welcome message - that's how I ended up on your talk page.

If you've never edited here before, there are a few useful links that you might want to look at, designed to help newcomers learn the ropes:

Here are a few features of Wikipedia that I find particularly helpful:

If you leave a message on a talk page, you can sign it with four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically produce your name and a date stamp when you save the page
The "Show preview" button allows you to look at what your post will look like before you save it - that way, you can proofread what you've written and not have to back and correct spelling mistakes, failed links, etc.
You can create a watchlist for yourself that will keep a record of any changes made to a page that interests you.

There are plenty of other features and facets of Wikipedia, many of which I probably haven't even discovered myself, so have fun looking around and finding them.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! - Tapir Terrific, 18:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Emperor Hadrian and the Fucine Lake

You added to Fucine Lake that Emperor Hadrian succeeded in draining the lake. Do you have a source for this? Everything I've read says that it was first drained in recent times. Did the lake subsequently re-fill or something? --Stemonitis 06:58, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your 1421 hypothesis edits

Hi. You added some debunking material to this article awhile back. It was recently deleted but I just restored it (this time to the "Criticism" section) since I think it could be useful. While "Wikipedia has no opinion of its' own", such criticisms can be included if they have been made by others that meet Wikipedia's requirements for credibility. I'm sure there are plenty of professional historians that have made these points; can you support these comments with footnotes, in-line links or references on the talk page? Right now, your material is fair game for Menzies fans to delete but with proper sourcing the burden of proving why your stuff should be deleted shifts to them and it will likely be a very heavy burden (assuming you're citing more than some kid's blog).
Thanks,
--A. B. 13:38, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]