User talk:IglasDj

Welcome!

Hello, IglasDj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 22:29, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Servet Duran (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Servet Duran may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:04, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IglasDj! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:04, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hello

I have make an new article about Servet Duran (check please) thanks!

@TheBirdsShedTears

TheBirdsShedTears

how can we the best do an conversation , is it just here like this?

??

IglasDj, if you want help you can go to the Wikipedia:Teahouse page and post a question there. Or, you can place "{{Help me}}" on this page where you want help. —Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 19:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Servet Duran (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Styyx was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The only sources that contribute to notability are sources 5 and 6 from Sabah and HaberTürk. The thing is, this source is supplied by one of the following agencies: AA, IHA or DHA. It's the exact same source with the exact same content, just published by a different website. Both of them have a disclaimer at the bottom saying they have no editorial sight of what is in the source. We are looking at one source instead of two different, which means this person doesn't pass WP:GNG. Clear attempt to REFBOMBing their way into having an article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Servet Duran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Servet Duran, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 18:29, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TO Styyx:

I respect your opinion and your answer to this article but there are points I don't understand: the article is flawless and is truth and facts with the necessary links to national news magazines and further links to the necessary music platforms where you can see that he is recognized as an official singer. As far as I know Wikipedia is a platform for articles or facts, which can range from a flower to a person. This has nothing to do with fame and even fame, how far is someone known, where do you draw the line? I am a fan of his and I can tell you that he is very much loved and he definitely deserves a short article about his life. And what the newspapers write or how and who it was written that is our job not to investigate it, we base ourselves on what is written, we are not going to play detectives.... If so then there are millions of articles that I also don't know and who in my eyes are not known at all, then they are all allowed online? I sometimes even read articles with 1 reference that have been approved and that is about someone who has climbed a mountain or a producer or .... are those people known? no, isn't it... Thank you for your review again — Preceding unsigned comment added by IglasDj (talk • contribs) 11:48, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IglasDj. You are absolutely correct about the fact that fame ≠ notability (having an article). The thing is that notability can't be based on personal views (pretty much echoing what you said). Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and certain criteria have to be met to have an article on it. We have to look at the sources and see if they actually contribute to notability, and if there are more than two, the subject becomes notable. This means that we actually have to look at the contents of source, by who it was written and by who it was published. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 15:19, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Response to "As far as I know Wikipedia is a platform for articles or facts, which can range from a flower to a person.": Wikipedia is a platform for factual articles, but that doesn't mean everything factual can be included in Wikipedia. Not everything true can be a part of the encyclopedia. If you want to read about why we have the notability requirement, you can look at Wikipedia:Notability#Why we have these requirements. —Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 19:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info I will ad new reference to the article... — Preceding unsigned comment added by IglasDj (talk • contribs) 15:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Servet Duran (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Danre98 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I agree with Styyx's analysis of the sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Servet Duran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Servet Duran, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 19:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Servet Duran

Hello, IglasDj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Servet Duran, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]