User talk:Igimena

January 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Shefali Razdan Duggal, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laser brain (talk) 03:20, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shefali Razdan Duggal. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Laser brain (talk) 16:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Laser brain (talk) 20:30, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop deleting content

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jushyosaha604 (talk • contribs) 21:38, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The content that you are adding is irrelevant. Igimena (talk) 03:51, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Laser brain (talk) 03:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Igimena (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only have this account I should not be blocked for a week. Igimena (talk) 03:50, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 05:19, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To the reviewing admin: This account is an SPA who's been repeatedly trying to make Shefali Razdan Duggal into a political CV. As you can see they've been reverted numerous times and already blocked 24 hours for disruption. They emailed me today complaining about not being able to make the edits, and then a new account was created to make the same edits. That was the basis for my sock tagging and blocking. --Laser brain (talk) 04:28, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]