User talk:Iesnikuf

May 2018

Hello, I'm TAnthony. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Morena Baccarin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — TAnthony^Talk 23:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summaries calling other editors "autistic" or "retarded" are inappropriate, and may be construed as personal attacks. Please take a better attitude if you want to be taken seriously as an editor. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 23:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Morena Baccarin. Thank you. — TAnthony^Talk 16:44, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also please read WP:Civility, your edit summaries are inappropriate and will get you blocked. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 16:46, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Iesnikuf, you are engaged in edit-warring and name-calling at Morena Baccarin, as well as violation of the WP:BLP requirement that claims of birth date be verified by a reliable-source citation. Please discontinue these behaviors or an admin may be asked to block your IP address from editing Wikipedia.--Tenebrae (talk) 22:28, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:25, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

edit summary

You've been blocked for using insulting/belittling/degrading edit summaries instead of informative, descriptive edit summaries. Edit summaries such as "changing DOB per new source" or "adding new source that supports DOB change" are the sort that would not have gotten you blocked. To be unblocked, please affirm your understanding of this and your intent to use descriptive, non insulting edit summaries. Any admin may unblock or change the conditions for unblock at their discretion.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:25, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]