User talk:Idensai

dat gaz. DJUnBalanced (talk) 15:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hey luke!

Re: Ellie Goulding discography

It was unsourced, plus WP:DISCOGSTYLE states that unreleased material should not be included in discographies. Snap Snap 00:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see why not, any songs that she has recorded still count as part of her discography, just the same as with any artist. Idensai (talk) 11:04, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source of zoology getting scrapped

http://i.imgur.com/oonFbxD.png if this is enough, as well as this: https://twitter.com/rob_swire/status/228681562546372608 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.42.72.228 (talk) 17:11, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's great I'll add them as references! Idensai (talk) 00:21, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Knife Party Picture

Hi, you just reverted my edit on Knife Party with "not needed" - that article did not have any pictures. As long as you cannot provide a better one - please don't remove it from that article. Or else: please explain, why this specific or pictures in general are not needed--Sujalajus (talk) 20:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a reason to add it to the article but I'll leave it if it makes you happy. Idensai (talk) 14:11, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Skrillex Discography

First of all, I did not edit it... Second, That wiki page is not yours, so don't act like you own it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefouad (talk • contribs) 19:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I never made any claim that the article belonged to me, however I make sure to keep the information on there factual and verified, correctly sourced and prevent vandalism.

All information that you have added/removed hasn't been referenced, nor has any of any of the information you've added been legitimate.

Both releases; "Ruffneck" and "Skrillex Vol 2" have been confirmed to be fan-based compilations and therefore not legitimate releases.

You also added "Niki & The Dove - DJ, Ease My Mind" as an official remix, but there is nothing but speculation to suggest this.

Until confirmation from a verified source it should remain as nothing more than "ID" under "As Skrillex". As for information you removed as to when it was first played, the category clearly states "Format/Notes" making the information that you deleted suitable for the entry that was made.

Please check your sources before editing again, I only ever remove false/unreferenced information. Idensai (talk) 02:47, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I never added the DJ, Ease My Mind remix/ID, so that's not true. However, I did not realise that those releases (Ruffneck & Skrillex Vol 2) were not legit, as I thought that the reference was legit, so I apologize for that, but I will not take the blaming for things I have not edited that were not true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefouad (talk • contribs) 17:50, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Knife Party discography

I like to think my edit summaries do a good enough job of explaining my edits. As I stated there, I removed everything that was not sourced reliably. Soundcloud, YouTube, Facebook and Twitter come under social networking and thus are unreliable. As for 'I have no right', please read WP:BOLD.--Laun chba ller 12:37, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I take the view that there is no point putting the post in two different places - either all in one place, or across two. No point having it across both. As for the unreleased tracks, read WP:UGC.--Laun chba ller 14:00, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Knife Party

Try reading the edit summaries. See User talk:Bgwhite#Knife_Party and WP:NALBUMS. Twitter refs from the band and YouTube are not reliable referenced. You are new and you haven't a clue on the rules around here. You cannot add the material back unless it is reliable referenced. Bgwhite (talk) 22:21, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Knife Party Idensai (talk) 00:34, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of What So Not

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on What So Not requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 00:33, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at User:Idensai/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:15, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Idensai, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:15, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Idensai/sandbox

Hello Idensai. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Idensai/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 11:33, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Idensai. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]