Jump to content

User talk:Ichibani

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Ichibani, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! . Alphachimp 19:53, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Memos:

[edit]

Arthroscopy really ought to be updated

[edit]

Needs to cover topics besides knee arthroscopy. Ichibani utc 17:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had one I may as well write about it. Ichibani utc 17:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Messages

[edit]

Toolbox

[edit]

No problem with the toolbox, I actually borrowed it from elsewhere. CASCADIAHowl/Trail 13:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]
Updated DYK query Did you know? was updated. On 2 May, 2007, a fact from the article 2008 Olympic Torch Relay, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--ALoan (Talk) 12:53, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

for letting me know about User:Tenisnut3. I am really not sure if they are sockpuppets because their edits are to tennis articles but the styles do not seem to be the same. But if you think they are, go ahead. I see that you have added a speedy delete tag to their Userpage. Is that accepted? - TwoOars (T | C) 03:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your report at AIV. Your report seems to be based on User:Austinwoodtennis's userpage (which was deleted as db-attack). So I see that userpages can also be tagged as attack pages and speedily deleted. Hmm. - TwoOars (T | C) 03:30, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD close

[edit]

Not sure what you're asking? AfDs can be closed anytime after 5 days, comments after that if they're still open are of course welcome, but once time's up they might get closed anytime. In this case it wouldn't make a tremendous difference, no consensus defaults to a keep anyway. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Generally would, but that one was an unusual case. The reason I closed no consensus there (aside from the fact that both sides had very valid points), was that it was brought up that time might make clearer whether the article should be kept or deleted, and there seemed a good chance that's indeed correct. Given that, and the good arguments on both sides, a no consensus close puts it to rest for now without prejudicing discussing it later if need be. It didn't look in this case like relisting would make a substantial difference. It's always a judgment call, of course. :) Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


AfD

[edit]

Oops. I didn't know what it was. When I clicked on it, it brought up HTML code in notepad. So I reasoned that you may have put it in there on accident. And I deleted your input unintentionall (I didn't scroll down far). I'll be more careful. Sorry! --Chris S. 06:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Ichibani. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]