User talk:Icez/200702
| This is an archive of User talk:Icez for February 2007. Please use the talk page to contact me. |
Message
[edit]http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Kiumars#Helllppppppppppppp
Yes I know but they are not copyright issues! And other people may be able to fill the missing information, isn’t this what we are here for? So, what is the next step? Can the article survive? Who is going to remove the copyright tag? Kiumars
Try http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Brenda_Shaffer/Temp please. can I republish it now? Is it ok? Kiumars
- Hello my friend; thanks for tidying up the article. I have not had much time to work on it. She is a very controversial character but very little info available on her! Kiumars
Message
[edit]Thanks Icez, I'm being lazy these days while prepairing for exams, but sure I will disturb you with questions once I'm back. ;)--Urumi 00:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Your VandalProof Application
[edit]Dear Icez,
Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you have 53 mainspace edits. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 15:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- When you get 250+ mainspace edits please re-apply Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 18:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Fair use...or not?
[edit]{helpme} I've been looking on WP:UPIMAGE and related pages about a picture of a Canadian scientist (that work(ed)s for the government). All I can find is the 'canadian-politician' copyright tag. I believe he isn't considered a politician if he is just a scientist (although has been Director General of his department?). Could someone please clarify whether Image:Lmorley.png is acceptable or not? I really wouldn't want to cause any troubles :) Thanks. → Icez {talk | contrib} 00:51, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'd say that in the current treatment of fair use, the Image:Lmorley.png should be deleted because it is replaceable (and a lot of replaceable fair use images have been deleted recently). You could get a 2nd opinion at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. You can get the image deleted by placing {{db-author}} on the image description page.--Commander Keane 01:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
After I added my one line of information today I realized this article is in the middle of a reorganization and some information and images have yet to be restored; please continue and I will re-add my one line when you are finished, sorry for the interruption. --CliffC 05:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 22:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
