User talk:Icarusatthesun/Archive 1

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 18:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Puerto Rican Independence Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hugo Rodríguez. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly notes

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 05:14, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Todos (political party)

Hello. Please stop changing the order of the Election results section in this article. Usually these sections are ordered by the precedence of the body being elected, which would mean the presidential results come first. Thanks, Number 5 7 13:59, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't a style guideline for this (it's too minor a detail to need one). It's simply common sense that the more powerful offices are listed first, and you will see the vast majority of political party articles follow this order (for example Justice and Development Party (Turkey)#Election results, Morena (political party)#Electoral_history, Conservative Party (UK)#Electoral performance and campaigns, Social Democratic Party of Germany#Election results etc etc). It would be absurd to list (for example) local elections before presidential ones because of alphabetical order. Number 5 7 23:12, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop doing this. Number 5 7 18:48, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]