User talk:Icarus58

Archives:

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of storms named Ampil (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

lacks any sources or references for storms apart from Tropical Storm Ampil.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of storms named Ampil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:17, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Icarus58! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:17, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello, I'm Hotwiki. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hotwiki (talk) 02:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conson 2021 move

Your argument gave off the impression that "there was a TS last 2016 so TS Conson should be kept the '(2021)' in it". True, it's confusing. True, Conson is named twice on tropical storms. But the one in 2021 did damage, while the 2016 is super duper minor—it barely affected any lands at all. It's a WP:PRIMARYRED issue.

So any thoughts on moving it? Bugnawfang (talk) 09:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

!Voting twice in RfD.

Please do not continue to do this. You !voted twice in this already-closed discussion, and did the same thing here, where I requested that you strike one of your !votes or turn it into a comment. Otherwise it is confusing for the closer. Please do so, and avoid accidentally duplicating your !votes in future. Thank-you. Cremastra (u — c) 19:42, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry I wouldn't do it again for the next votes. ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 21:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Cremastra (u — c) 01:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Icarus58 and Cremastra: As far as I can tell, this is the only time that you took part in one discussion under two different names (assuming the IP belongs to you, Icarus58?),[1] but numerous edits were made by both of them. I'm sure that this would have largely been done accidentally, but please be careful to always log in before you edit, and keep WP:SOCK in mind. If you want to keep editing without logging into your main account (I understand there are situations where one might not want to log in for security reasons), maybe create an alternative account, and use Template:User alternative account banner to disclose it? Renerpho (talk) 01:11, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the IP doesn't belong to you then I apologize. The discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 20#3.1415926535… just gave off that impression. Renerpho (talk) 01:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very confident the IP is separate. They've been around for a long time, and their writing patterns are different. Cremastra (u — c) 12:34, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay good. Renerpho (talk) 22:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

It's obvious that you want your signature to all appear in one line without being broken, but having your signature on a brand new line with a new indent symbol (":" or "*") causes issues with accessibility, specifically with screen readers. And, I see why you have been putting your signature on a new line: The space between the words "The" and "Astrologer" can cause your signature to get split up. However, there's a way around this: replacing the space with a non-breaking space ( ). To show you what I mean, here's the code of your current signature:

[[User:Icarus58|✴️Icarus]][[User talk:Icarus58|The Astrologer✴️]] 

...And here's how it appears after inserting the non-breaking space between "The" and "Astrologer":

[[User:Icarus58|✴️Icarus]][[User talk:Icarus58|The Astrologer✴️]] 

...which appears identical as before, but will move the entire signature to the next line if the word "Astrologer" traditionally pushes the text past the end of the line: ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️

Hope that helps! Steel1943 (talk) 18:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Icarus58, please revert the Gino March edit of the removal of acquired programming aired on Philippine television cause WP: ANI of Gino March, thank you 2001:4453:6F7:1A00:2DCA:D155:ADC9:30EA (talk) 01:37, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will reported later on the incident issues for Gino March in violated the rule WP:ANI. Thank you for your requests.😊 ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 11:23, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting a edit on article TV Patrol

Hello, sir @Icarus58....

Please revert a edit on article TV Patrol like this:

Special:Diff/1263390766

Thanks..... 2001:448A:1020:5990:3961:A021:D0AC:CA18 (talk) 11:50, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]