User talk:Ibnebatutaji

you are from Rawalpindi Pakistan

You are supporting Total siyapaa inspite of the majority of negative reviews as you are from Pakistan and the lead actor is from Pakistan. You can't be biased in favour of a critically panned movie only because you are a fan of the movie's lead actor. You want him to survive in Bollywood , then Wikipedia is not the place to promote Ali Zafar. i trackd your Ip address(39.32.187.61)that you left on total Siyapaa's talk page after you were blocked.

Sock-puppetry

Sock-puppetry is a tall claim without a backing, if you think Vvarkey is a sock then report them instead of doing so in edit summaries. Until and unless he is proved to be a sock you cannot revert him. —Soham (talk) 03:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pattren of edit is 100% same and soon you will see how admin will check these 3 users and block them as socks. and for You i advise that you can not revert others Warnings even on your own talk page. It is bad faith so Brother i will strongly recommend you to follow what WP rules which say no sock puppetry or bad faith editing. Ibnebatutaji (talk) 03:50, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Read this. The edit request irrespective of the editor who made it contains reliable sources. Learn to assume that a person is not a sock. —Soham (talk) 03:56, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for for continually making unsubstantiated claims of WP:SOCK without filing appropriate WP:SPI, and improperly removing valid talkpage comments/discussion based on those unsubstantiated beliefs. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. D P 11:16, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DangerousPanda I accept your block but I felt that you blocked me immediately with out even giving an opportunity of being heard that is why I used IP clearly declaring my name instead of socking hiddenly by using new user account. Had i bad faith then why I would have agreed to the User soham edits as a moderator 4 days ago as a matter of WP consensus. Bad faith is very clearly reflected by comments of sock users see last edit on my talk page. Interestingly they are once declaring me producer and once as a pakistani supporting Pakistani lead actor. Is not this biased approach and should such comments and approach be allowed on WP? Again respect and regards. Ibnebatutaji (talk) 02:24, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. How you doing? Can we have an acceptance speech or you want me to go diff hunting? -- SMS ^Talk 03:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SMS, looks like you'll have to opt for the second mate. – Soham (talk) 12:47, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

who are you ?