User talk:Iazyges/Archives/2017/October
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Iazyges. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
German destroyers
Hi, you have five German destroyers at ACR at the moment and it seems a couple of reviewers are giving feedback that relates to the whole series. Do you think it might be a good idea to shelve four of them for the time being and work with reviewers on just one of them until everybody's happy to avoid lots of duplicated effort and to give you a chance to focus on one without being distracted by things going on with the others? You could also reach out to some of the other warship experts for advice. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:56, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- @HJ Mitchell: I'm not sure what the best course of action is. @Parsecboy: any suggestions? -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- I generally try to keep it to one at a time, at least for closely related articles like in this case, in part because I don't want to overload reviewers, and in part because comments that apply to one are likely to apply to the others, and if you can address those from the first review, they won't be problems with later reviews on the other articles. Parsecboy (talk) 16:23, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- This is generally my thinking as well. I sometimes have one at FAC and one at ACR, with perhaps a third if the first two are progressing well. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- I generally try to keep it to one at a time, at least for closely related articles like in this case, in part because I don't want to overload reviewers, and in part because comments that apply to one are likely to apply to the others, and if you can address those from the first review, they won't be problems with later reviews on the other articles. Parsecboy (talk) 16:23, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).
Administrator changes
Boing! said Zebedee • Ansh666 • Ad Orientem
Tonywalton • AmiDaniel • Silence • BanyanTree • Magioladitis • Vanamonde93 • Mr.Z-man • Jdavidb • Jakec • Ram-Man • Yelyos • Kurt Shaped Box
Guideline and policy news
- Following a successful proposal to create it, a new user right called "edit filter helper" is now assignable and revocable by administrators. The right allows non-administrators to view the details of private edit filters, but not to edit them.
- Following a discussion about mass-application of ECP and how the need for logging and other details of an evolving consensus may have been missed by some administrators, a rough guide to extended confirmed protection has been written. This information page describes how the extended-confirmed aspects of the protection policy are currently being applied by administrators.
Technical news
- You can now search for IP ranges at Special:Contributions. Some log pages and Special:DeletedContributions are not yet supported. Wildcards (e.g. 192.168.0.*) are also not supported, but the popular contribsrange gadget will continue to work.
Arbitration
- Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
- A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
Emptying of Roman walls/limes in Britannia
Hi. You might want to review recent contributions by Rjdeadly who has been emptying and shuffling some of the Roman wall/limes categories in the UK. It's not my subject at all but I know you worked on them about a year ago and there was some discussion of the subject at that time, I thought you might like a heads-up. Cheers. Le Deluge (talk) 10:25, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXVIII, October 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Roman walls in the United Kingdom
A tag has been placed on Category:Roman walls in the United Kingdom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT go beyond 17:07, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Type 1937J destroyer
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Type 1937J destroyer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of A Den Jentyl Ettien Avel Dysklyver -- A Den Jentyl Ettien Avel Dysklyver (talk) 12:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I have reviewed the Type 1937J destroyer article you created, I have made a long list of things that bug me and could be improved, you can see them here. It's nothing major, mostly me being nitpicky - I will have another look at the article once you have seen what you can do about the possible improvements. You can {{ping}} me to get my attention. Dysklyver 12:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 24
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 24, August-September 2017
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Star Coordinator Award - last quarter's star coordinator: User:Csisc
- Wikimania Birds of a Feather session roundup
- Spotlight: Wiki Loves Archives
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Kiswahili and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
- We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.
Technology update:
- Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.
General project update:
- The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
- To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Ersatz Zenta-class cruiser
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ersatz Zenta-class cruiser you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:21, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia Asian Month 2017: Invitation to Participate
Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.
I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!
Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!
If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.
Thank you!
- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team
This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.
Your GA nomination of Type 1937J destroyer
The article Type 1937J destroyer you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Type 1937J destroyer for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of A Den Jentyl Ettien Avel Dysklyver -- A Den Jentyl Ettien Avel Dysklyver (talk) 19:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Military History Template Usage
While reviewing the series of Milecastle articles 1-... I found that every entry on the talk page of WP Military History consisted of the entire template with only one category changed (class). I have cleaned it up on a lot of them but I would appreciate it if you would clean up the remainder as to make it easier for all WP on Wikipedia, not just WP Military History. Dondville (talk) 09:46, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Type 1945 destroyer
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Type 1945 destroyer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 19:22, 31 October 2017 (UTC)