Jump to content

User talk:Ian Wolfman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:IanWilliam20)

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Teamwork Barnstar
Hi.

It is my pleasure to present you the Teamwork Barnstar because your contributions (at least those that I have seen) are well-thought and need no cleanup at all. Your citation footnotes quality is top-notch.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 00:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Barnstar of Diligence
Hi. Good work on the Microsoft Office 2010 article. FleetCommand (Speak your mind!) 09:49, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paste options?

[edit]

Hi.

I believe you should write "pasting options" instead of "paste options". The later sounds like that act of choosing what you'd put on your sandwich.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 10:11, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Codename Lisa, ah, I can do that, of course. I had just used the same...terminology that the original article did. Thank you for your input. (IanWilliam20 (talk) 16:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Ian Wolfman. You have new messages at Talk:Microsoft Office XP.
Message added 18:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Modernponderer (talk) 18:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please let me know how soon you plan to complete this? Thank you. Modernponderer (talk) 21:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI, I did respond at Talk:Microsoft Office XP#Removed features, but I forgot to ping your username. Just letting you know in case you miss my reply because of that. Modernponderer (talk) 22:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
Well, hello! Look who is back. The amazing IanWilliam20, who makes pure good contributions.

I didn't see you around the whole October and before that, you just made a couple of edits. Anyway, it is always a pleasure to see an editor who knows how to make perfect edits. Codename Lisa (talk) 06:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Codename Lisa: Thank you very, very much for your kind words, though I do not consider myself to be amazing! I am grateful that you appreciate the contributions and that you had thought of me, as well as for your continued and consistent support! (IanWilliam20 (talk) 21:08, 18 December 2017 (UTC))[reply]

HomeGroup

[edit]

Hello, coolest editor in Wikipedia! It has been a long time since I reverted any of your edits.

Joke aside, I am here to talk about revision 816037067 in which you wrote "users can make files and printers shared in a HomeGroup accessible to Windows XP and Windows Vista." When you write such a thing in the HomeGroup section, you are implying that it has something to do with HomeGroup itself because it offers some degree of backward compatibility.

In truth, that is not the case. What the source has explained is share the files and folders with HomeGroup once, and then sharing it using conventional file sharing protocol yet another time.

I way, what you added is already said:

HomeGroup computers can also be a member of a Windows domain or Windows workgroup at the same time and take advantage of those file sharing mechanisms.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 08:05, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are so nice to me! The reverted edit, however, was sadly not very good in spite of your previous appraisal.
If I may, I did not mean to imply that HomeGroup protocols were used to make content accessible to Windows XP and Windows Vista, though I understand that it did read that way because of the way it was written. I wonder if you would mind if I tried to make it explicit that HomeGroup content is accessible to these operating systems, perhaps by rephrasing the reverted details—with the reverted citation—but also by emphasizing the traditional file sharing mechanisms? Thank you for your time and for your thoughts on this matter! (IanWilliam20 (talk) 19:00, 20 December 2017 (UTC))[reply]
Yeah, go ahead. (Just for the record, tou don't need my permission for trying a new variation.)
Codename Lisa (talk) 21:28, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! (IanWilliam20 (talk) 01:50, 27 December 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Your GA nomination of Microsoft Office XP

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Microsoft Office XP you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Enterprisey -- Enterprisey (talk) 04:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Microsoft Office XP

[edit]

The article Microsoft Office XP you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Microsoft Office XP for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Enterprisey -- Enterprisey (talk) 12:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. I knew you could do it.
Due dilligence finally paid off. (Or maybe people in charge of the GA process are afraid of werewolves. 😉)
Codename Lisa (talk) 13:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WMDC-Vista.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WMDC-Vista.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Ian Wolfman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Microsoft Office Picture Manager you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CelestialWeevil -- CelestialWeevil (talk) 18:20, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Microsoft Office Picture Manager you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Microsoft Office Picture Manager for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CelestialWeevil -- CelestialWeevil (talk) 19:40, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Microsoft Office Picture Manager you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Microsoft Office Picture Manager for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CelestialWeevil -- CelestialWeevil (talk) 20:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Windows Vista editions

[edit]

The article Windows Vista editions you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Windows Vista editions for issues which need to be addressed. flowing dreams (talk page) 08:10, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Windows Vista editions

[edit]

The article Windows Vista editions you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Windows Vista editions for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. flowing dreams (talk page) 08:40, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!

[edit]

Hi! I just saw the message you left on my talk page. Thank you for the kind message!! I really appreciate it :) Граймс (talk) 08:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Windows Speech Recognition

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Windows Speech Recognition you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:20, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Windows Speech Recognition

[edit]

The article Windows Speech Recognition you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Windows Speech Recognition for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Windows Speech Recognition

[edit]

The article Windows Speech Recognition you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Windows Speech Recognition for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:02, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Windows Vista (PRODUCT) RED.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Windows Vista (PRODUCT) RED.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:18, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WSRIcon.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WSRIcon.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Windows Vista, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Messenger service. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]