User talk:Iampharzad

February 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:47, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 10:05, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Barak (cloth)

Hey, just letting you know I've turned the above article you created into a draft. This is so you can continue to work on it. I've added one good source (Encyclopaedia Iranica), but you still need at least one more. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 00:19, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hazara clothing moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hazara clothing, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – NJD-DE (talk) 22:03, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm Njd-de. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Hazaras have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. khamakshop.com – NJD-DE (talk) 22:53, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—C.Fred (talk) 03:46, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello respectful @C.Fred:, The source that I have added are based on contemporary genetic research, in which the correct source says that the Hazaras are more closely related to the people of Central Asia, especially the Turkic populations of Central Asia, than to the East Asians or the Mongolians.--Iampharzad (talk) 04:11, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: You can see the source site [1]. Thank You--Iampharzad (talk) 04:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Iampharzad. KoizumiBS (talk) 17:03, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shamila Shirzad

The article Shamila Shirzad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON, Does not meet WP:NACTOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Twisterdel (talk) 08:26, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Respectful @Kansas Bear: The editing war begins with two. We had the right to defend our correct edits. About my editing: The source clearly stated that the Hazaras are more closely related to the Turkic people of Central Asia than to East Asia and the Mongolians. Plaese see [2] I defend this edition because it is not surprising. The reliable information I added is based on genetic experiments. Thank you--Iampharzad (talk) 21:47, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are now in a situation where there is a content dispute. You need to resolve the matter at the talk page, rather than edit warring, especially since this message implies an intent to continue to edit war. Quite frankly, any further reverts by you in this matter could result in a block, whether you violate 3RR or not, for intentional edit warring. —C.Fred (talk) 04:40, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

C.Fred, Very sorry, I will be very careful with my edits respectable Administrator.

The purpose of my rollback was the changes made by KoizumiBS.

He has made changes and deletions of information that was already included in the article. These kinds of changes lead the article's topic disputed.--Iampharzad (talk) 06:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You also removed information that isn't included in the article.--KoizumiBS (talk) 06:25, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:37, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Hazaras) for WP:DISRUPTION as noted at Special:permalink/1111565793#Unresolved ANI case and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1108#Iampharzad. Although this a DS area, this is a regular admin block.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:31, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Due to continued disruption, including some extremely ill-advised edit warring, I've extended the block site wide.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jezebel's Ponyo: I also wanted to be blocked because this wikipedia is for some people and not for people who want to have honest cooperation in Wikipedia. Good bye--Iampharzad (talk) 22:14, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muhammad Akram Gizabi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad Akram Gizabi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Akram Gizabi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hazara Birar ^(Talk) 01:39, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Field instruments" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Field instruments and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 7#Field instruments until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:14, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abuzar Ghaznawi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Abuzar Ghaznawi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:04, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Basir Ahmad Dowlatabadi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Basir Ahmad Dowlatabadi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:12, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Abuzar Ghaznawi.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Abuzar Ghaznawi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Basir Ahmad Dowlatabadi

Hello, Iampharzad. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Basir Ahmad Dowlatabadi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Abuzar Ghaznawi

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Abuzar Ghaznawi has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:03, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]