User talk:Iamnotcreative

Welcome!

Hello, Iamnotcreative, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sitush (talk) 10:19, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Have you made any edits that weren't copied from elsewhere? Will you help us by removing all that you copied? Dougweller (talk) 12:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Kaukura has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 13:18, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing problems

I have just spent some considerable time removing numerous of your contributions. I know that at least one other person has also removed a few today, and that various individuals have removed the odd one here and there in the interval between my welcome message above and today. As far as I can determine, just one of your contributions made over the last few weeks has survived, and that was a wikilink. All of the remainder have been removed as either being definite copyright violations or probable unattributed copy/pastes and completely unsourced.

This is not good enough, even though I am aware that you are a new-ish contributor. Please can you take a read of the blue links noted in the various messages above, and please be aware that if I have to spend yet another hour cleaning up the problems in, say, a week's time then it is possible that you will be blocked from contributing until you demonstrate a commitment to change your ways. It is very time-consuming to sort out disruptive edits on this scale: most of us have better things that we could be doing. - Sitush (talk) 14:57, 7 June 2012 (UTC) Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. KATANAGOD (talk) 11:16, 8 June 2012 (UTC) This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. KATANAGOD (talk) 11:19, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 13:26, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that indefinitely means just that, you could be unblocked today if you can convince an Administrator that you understand the problems you have cause and how you will avoid them in the future. Dougweller (talk) 13:28, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

Following your email I've unblocked you. I strongly suggest you carefully read and follow Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Dougweller (talk) 13:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And a read of our policies regardin verifiability and reliable sources would probably also assist. WP:Citing sources could be of help to you in this regard. - Sitush (talk) 13:11, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:32, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 4sync

The article 4sync has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:28, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]