User talk:Iamiyouareyou

TAKE A DEEP BREATH AND CALM DOWN THAN POLITELY type in your concern BEFORE YOU GO AND CALL UP THE WIKIPIDEA POLICE!

Please leave your new message here, including subject/headline, and sign it accordingly.

COO-KIEEE!

Hey, thank you. I love COOKIES!! --Thnidu (talk) 21:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Iamiyouareyou! I am Elektrik Shoos and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!

elektrik SHOOS 03:22, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pentacross image

Hi there, I'm afraid I have removed the image you kindly put on the article Christianity and Neopaganism - have given my reasons on the article's talk page. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 08:38, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page stubs for Christan wicca & Christopaganism

I Put those pages up because in a world were bigotry is rampant many Christo faith Wiccans, Pagans, and neopagans are "hiding in the broom closet". So I made the stubs to give the two similar yet separate paths each a page so that whom ever shall have more knowledge can add some.Iamiyouareyou (talk) 18:41, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christan wicca

The article Christan wicca has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

selfpublished book of dubious importance

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Melaen (talk) 23:03, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing I can do to stop this so... okidoki

 IamIYouareYou

02:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Christan wicca

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Christan wicca. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Christianity_and_Neopaganism#Christian_Wicca. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Christianity_and_Neopaganism#Christian_Wicca - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.

No point in creating a duplicate article with a mis-spelled title. No point in creating a duplicate article unless you have something extra to add to what is already in Wikipedia. PamD (talk) 13:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Christopaganism

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Christopaganism. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Christian_Wicca#Christopaganism. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Christian_Wicca#Christopaganism - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.

Apart from the above points, you must not copy material from one WP article into another as it loses the history of "who wrote what" which is essential in Wikipedia - see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and WP:Splitting. PamD (talk) 13:44, 14 January 2011 (UTC) PamD (talk) 13:44, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Until there is more information or I can make the article per standard style, I guess it shall be deleted

 IamIYouareYou

15:42, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

stubs

Please don't waste people's time by adding {{stub}} to an article such as Rick Altman which already has a specific stub template. And please note that stub templates go at the end, not the beginnning, of articles - see WP:LAYOUT. Thanks. PamD (talk) 08:57, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Iamiyouareyou. You have new messages at Talk:Genderqueer.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Bbb23 (talk) 15:36, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your actions at User talk:Jccope1029

Please do not encourage new editors to make bad edits by disparaging another editor. Whether you agree or disagree with Nymf is irrelevant. You need to think about what you've done. You removed a valid welcome message that had useful links that the editor in question obviously did not read before continuing to make inappropriate edits. Nymf's warning was a second warning, and that's the correct thing to do when the first warning has been ignored. You have NO business removing, changing or striking the comments of other editors, nor do you have the right to frame your comments as a personal attack, by using words such as "brash" and "mean". If you had something to say you could have added it, you could have given your cookies, even a bunch of flowers if you felt so moved, but you must leave other comments alone unless they breach a Wikipedia policy. If User:Jccope1029 wants to remove the comments, he/she can do so, but not you. I will restore that page. I will leave your comments as they are, except to remove your personal attack which is not acceptable per WP:No personal attacks. Rossrs (talk) 15:43, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Ok
Iamiyouareyou (talk) 15:45, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for cookies...:) Bonafide2004 (talk) 00:37, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flan etc.

(see also Talk:Crème caramel) Hi, thanks for contributing to the Crème caramel article. I have a few comments which I hope will help you edit this and other articles more effectively.

You have changed 'flan' to 'Flan', arguing that 'flan' is a proper noun. Do you have any evidence for that? Why is it not a common noun like other names of dishes, e.g. pizza, roast beef, moussaka, etc.? Do you have any reliable sources backing up your claim?

You have also added vertical whitespace presumably to make the photos format better. Unfortunately, that method is not reliable -- as WP:PIC says, "Remember that text will flow and wrap differently for other users, based on their chosen browser, screen resolution, default font size, accessibility options, number of toolbars and sidebars (such as instant messaging panes) and more. Do not force page design just so that it looks pretty on your display. Hack only where absolutely necessary. Wherever possible, just use the simplest logical page flow."

For the capitalization of section headings, please see the relevant section of the Manual of Style.

Thanks again for your interest. --Macrakis (talk) 20:52, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I Still feel that flan should be capitalized bu since almost al dictionaries I looked at list the word as a common noun I will leave it lowercase.Iamiyouareyou (talk) 22:00, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Iamiyouareyou,

Several issues here:

Why are you capitalizing crème brûlée when the capitalized form is very rare both in French and in English according to Google ngrams?

You give as an etymology of "crème ~~brûlée~~caramel":

"From early 20^th century French meaning 'carmel custard'"

Footnote: Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd Edition (1989); Petit Robert 1973.

First of all, "carmel" is misspelled here (I corrected it, but you changed it back) and appears nowhere in the OED 2nd edition (online) in the sense of 'caramel' (though it appears in Mt. Carmel, the city of Carmel, a woman called Carmel, etc.). Secondly, I don't see any place in the OED or in the Petit Robert where it dates this as "early 20th century French" or as meaning 'caramel custard' (the OED's definition is 'a custard coated with caramel', and it gives no etymology for the phrase, which is in any case transparent). Third, the Petit Robert (as it happens, I have the 1973 edition on my bookshelf) doesn't even mention crème caramel, though it does mention crème renversée, which is the same thing. The closest I can see is the OED citation of the 1906 Mrs. Beeton, which says "Crème Caramel renversée. Caramel Pudding.".

I would appreciate understanding where these discrepancies come from. Thanks, --Macrakis (talk) 03:59, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LGBT sidebar

Just a note to let you know that the page move from Template:LGBT sidebar to Template:LGBTQ sidebar has been undone. It is fine to move uncontroversial page names with no discussion, but adding the term Genderqueer to LGBT is not uncontroversial. If you still think the page should have a different title, please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves so that any move is done with the full knowledge and consensus of the editors of that page. Cheers, Daicaregos (talk) 09:09, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Iamiyouareyou! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mootros (talk) 11:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

re Incremental service awards

HI Iamiyouareyou. Thanks for creating these. There's some question over whether its a good idea to have these or not, so I moved them to your userspace for the time being: User:Iamiyouareyou/Incremental service awards. There's a thread on the talk page of Wikipedia_talk:Service_awards#.5Bfine_graded.5D_Incremental_awards.3F if you want to make a case for these. Herostratus (talk) 20:01, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Genderqueer pride flag for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genderqueer pride flag is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genderqueer pride flag until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Blue Rasberry (talk) 01:50, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

testing auto new message thingy

1..... 2..... 3))) 3))) 3))) ooo echo))) oh))

Iamiyouareyou (talk) 07:59, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for the welcome! If I have any problems understanding anything, would it be okay if I came to you? The Duchess of Cambridge (talk) 16:17, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, definitely don't merge the two articles; freerunning and parkour are two different practices. Instead of overlapping the two articles, we should add emphasis into each article about how the two differ. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.219.134.72 (talk) 20:17, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template talk:Christianityfooter#Adding new article links, only Top-importance Christianity articles

Rvt—

No WP:CON; see WP:WikiProject Christianity/Core topics work group/Topic list or Template talk:Christianityfooter#Adding new article links, only Top-importance Christianity articles ^{şṗøʀĸşṗøʀĸ: τᴀʟĸ} 19:51, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok cool I get it. OOO Do you think a list template should be made for topics like that one.

"Christianity and topic" list?

ya I'm gonna make one. Iamiyouareyou (talk) 15:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Corss namespace redirects

Are you aware that Article and Wikipedia project pages may not be redirected to user space? Please change User:Iamiyouareyou/Pages/ Incremental Service Awards - it is confusing me, and based on that , I imagine it is confusing others. Please delete the redeirect page or ask me to do it for you. If you are not intending to work on your draft any more, you may wish to ask for a user deletion too. if you need any help please do not hesitate to ask me on my talk page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:22, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You lost me were is the page? Iamiyouareyou (talk) 17:16, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Namespaces again

I don't think Incremental Service Award really belongs in article-space - is it really meant to be an encyclopædia article? If it's a draft, it might be more appropriate to work on it in userspace. If it's supposed to be a genuine policy/system, it might be better placed somewhere like this. Should the article be deleted? bobrayner (talk) 15:47, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Incremental Service Award

The article Incremental Service Award has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia-specific content misplaced in article namespace; duplicates a page in Wikipedia namespace at Wikipedia:Incremental service awards. No salvageable encyclopedic content.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Muchness (talk) 16:08, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama

I just reverted your edits to Barack Obama. The website listed should be the home page, not a sub page. Also, reliable sources refer to Obama as "African American" and do not refer to what "percentage" of same he might be. Our article must reflect what is said in reliable sources. -- Scjessey (talk) 16:46, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider self-reverting this edit. It is essentially a violation of Wikipedia's policy on biographies for living people because it adds unreferenced, potentially controversial original research to the article. -- Scjessey (talk) 17:18, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't stop edit warring, you are likely to find yourself formally warned for it. Please self revert your edit to Barack Obama. Please discuss this further on the article talk page if you feel strongly about it. -- Scjessey (talk) 17:39, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit-war. The topic is a perennial non-starter, and extensive qualification about "percentages" sheds no light on the subject. The appropriate place to discuss this is on the talkpage, although nearly everyone is tired of fielding daily questions against consensus. You may consider this a formal warning concerning edit-warring. Acroterion (talk) 17:48, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IP talk page edit

Hi. What was the meaning of this edit [1], "Serves you right punk.Iamiyouareyou (talk) 8:40 am, Today (UTC−6)"? To whom were you addressing your comment? Thanks, JoeSperrazza (talk) 16:35, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To whom ever keeps adding disruptive edits through that ip adress.Iamiyouareyou (talk) 16:42, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. JoeSperrazza (talk) 19:32, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia as a reference

Please stop adding Wikipedia as a source to the article Tampa, Florida. The Wikipedia policy WP:CIRCULAR specifically prohibits the use of Wikipedia as a source in Wikipedia articles. --Muchness (talk) 11:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incremental service awards

There is currently a discussion regarding incremental service awards taking place at Wikipedia talk:Service awards#Incremental service awards misnomer that might interest you. – PartTimeGnome (talk | contribs) 15:42, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I won boom!

Merge discussion for Pangender

An article that you have been involved in editing, Pangender , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. April Arcus (talk) 07:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You no get mad okide

Boooty posting on here because you can not do reasche and use false info is prohibited butt Iamiyouareyou (talk) 00:30, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What?

VHRRRT, EXSCUSE ME I FARTED! Oh my god You did ewww please open a window! Iamiyouareyou (talk) 04:31, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am Watching you!

Anyone Who edits this page Will be Watched! Iamiyouareyou (talk) 15:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Incremental service awards (Ribbons)

Wikipedia:Incremental service awards (Ribbons), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Incremental service awards (Ribbons) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Incremental service awards (Ribbons) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mootros (talk) 08:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

testing 2

19:52, 27 April 2016 (UTC)Iamiyouareyou (talk)

May 2016

Hello, I'm Gladamas. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to 2-step garage— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –Gladamas^talk 17:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Kaobear. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Theme from Star Trek has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kaobear (talk) 16:00, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Batman Theme. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HalJor (talk) 15:04, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Batman Theme. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. HalJor (talk) 17:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jinkiees Batman he got the name of our theme song Allll wrong! 21:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

AIV report of User:HalJor

This was inappropriate. Please explain yourself. Sro23 (talk) 21:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User_talk:HalJor, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. HalJor (talk) 00:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Iamiyouareyou. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Potter's House Church, Dallas. HalJor (talk) 15:30, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COO-KIEEE!

Hey, thank you. I love COOKIES!! Thnidu (talk) 21:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. HalJor (talk) 22:23, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Archived Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive952#Repeated harassment by editor Iamiyouareyou -- PBS (talk) 09:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 00:54, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]