User talk:Iamananonymousindividual123

Welcome!

Hello, Iamananonymousindividual123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:29, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert S. Coleman, Jr.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Robert S. Coleman, Jr. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jeancey (talk) 03:38, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Robert S. Coleman, Jr."

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on "Robert S. Coleman, Jr." requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jncraton (talk) 04:16, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning on biographies of living persons

If you create another attack page, you will be blocked from editing. Our biographies of living persons policy strictly forbids placing negative or potentially controversial information about any living person anywhere on Wikipedia, unless it is presented in context, with appropriate weight, in a neutral tone, and sourced to a high-quality and very reputable source. Rumor and innuendo, especially when it is negative material about a living person, are never acceptable for an article (or anywhere else on Wikipedia). Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:34, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To Seraphimblade

Please explain to me how the article in question is an attack page. It is properly referenced. I smell censorship.

I am of course not going to violate BLP myself and repeat exactly what you said. You had a couple of references to Forbes for some of the negative information, though it seemed the main purpose of the article was to present such information, not to present a balanced view of the subject as a whole. This is called a coatrack, and we don't allow them. However, there were several other parts of the article which were "office rumor" type allegations, totally unreferenced to anything and totally speculative. I am quite certain you know the material to which I refer. In your edits to other articles, you have inserted your personal viewpoint, and again made negative allegations unsourced to any reputable source. These types of edits are not acceptable. Wikipedia is not here to be used as an attack vehicle, or for you to post your own personal thoughts about people you don't like, it is to collect and summarize material already published by high-quality sources. You may call that censorship if you like, but those rules apply to every editor here, and if you'd like to be one, you are required to follow them as well. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:01, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, this is the type of edit you'd want to do more of. It's written in a neutral tone, just providing information. The only problem with the edit is that it cites another Wikipedia article, which we try to avoid in order to keep away from circularity (one article references another, which...), but that's a minor issue. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:08, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK Sounds Good

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:49, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Editorializing

Your edits to Charles Koch might be seen as editorializing by some. I suggest you revisit them and make some changes to their tone so that their information content will be retained by subsequent editors. Abductive (reasoning) 18:48, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]