User talk:Iam muheeb
December 2022
[edit]Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Kilt accessories—has been undone because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thank you. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 06:05, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
November 2023
[edit]Hello, I'm DarmaniLink. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Tartan because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. DarmaniLink (talk) 11:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, Yes, I recently placed a link on the Tartan Wikipedia page, as I noticed there were other external links present. My intention was to contribute to the platform and enhance the available information. However, I now realize that my actions might not have been entirely appropriate, and for that, I apologize.
- I am actively involved in the world of tartans, with a collection of over 1400 unique designs, and I frequently write blogs on this subject. Given my expertise in this field, I would like to inquire about the criteria for adding relevant links to Wikipedia pages. Could you kindly provide some guidance on the appropriate process and standards for doing so?
- I am eager to ensure that my contributions align with Wikipedia's guidelines and maintain the highest level of quality and relevance. Iam muheeb (talk) 06:17, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- So, here's how relevant links works.
- If the site's primary purpose is sales, the answer is absolutely not, never, unless its an article about a notable website ,such as Amazon.com, the answer is never add them.
- If its a news website or otherwise a information on the subject that can support something, usually, yes.
- If its an academic (.edu) with more information about the subject, the answer is yes, but its better placed in a ref.
- If you have knowledge about the topic and would like to share knowledge and improve articles by expanding articles with non-promotional, relevant and reliable sources (they don't have to be in english, by the way), you can add them as references. (see MOS:REFERENCES)
- In short, add knowledge to the platform. Don't add online store fronts. I'll leave you a canned welcome message with a bunch of intra-wikipedia links with further information on how to get started. DarmaniLink (talk) 09:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, DarmaniLink (talk) 09:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
June 2024
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ... discospinster talk 16:58, 4 June 2024 (UTC)