User talk:I has unique username

License tagging for File:Album exilarch cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Album exilarch cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:07, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

C1 Template

Until the digital age, every "single" contained more than one track (at least a b-side) - unless it was a radio promo or something. In the CD age, the distinction between EP and single became blurred... so blurred that basically, if it's considered a single, it's a single (see Oasis), if it's considered an EP, it's an EP. To me, these are all clearly singles because their primary purpose is to promote the title track. None is labeled "EP" and (as far as I know) none has more than an extra track or three besides title track remixes. EPs, as you may know, generally consist of new tracks or a single from an album backed by, say, 5-7 (usually unique) other tracks. Sometimes it just depends on what the artist decides to call it as I said earlier...

As to adding spaces, "[[Song Title]]"{{·w}}<space> is the proper format. It may look neater in code to have a space on either side of the {{·w}} but, unfortunately, this adds an extra space in the actual presentation (so there's two spaces on the left and one on the right). Then, of course, the reason it looks funny when the titles are in italics is because the letters are slanted towards the dot, making it look like there's less space on the left side. A way around this is italicizing the dot: ''[[EP Title]]{{·w}}''<space>. Cheers, Wikkitywack (talk) 05:56, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Andain M2M cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Andain M2M cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Andain_M2M_cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Andain_M2M_cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 09:22, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Much Too Much (Andain song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Much Too Much (Andain song), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CA and San Rafael (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Thanks for writing the article You Once Told Me, Best, Tito Dutta ✉ 17:25, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also glad to see another fan took the time to write the page. Thank you! 67.149.95.69 (talk) 01:25, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, guys. Much appreciated. :) I has unique username (talk) 20:43, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Breakout clones

Hey—I see that you've built out much of the Breakout clone section and have done some awesome work with it. I'm concerned about many of the games' notability, though. Currently many do not use any reliable sources per WP:VG/S and instead use self-published information (WP:VG/OFFICIAL). As I've been told, the standard for "notability" is at least two reviews from reliable sources or something similar. Perhaps some of the titles can be merged into Breakout clones instead? Also several articles list a full version history, which should be removed by WP:VGSCOPE #9. I wanted to bring this up with you to see how I can help resolve these things in lieu of just going to AfD. czar · · 16:51, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, I has unique username. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Summer Calling

The article Summer Calling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSONG. No apparent charting history. A search for significant coverage in reliable sources offered little to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ℯ xplicit 05:34, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Album summer calling cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Album summer calling cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Andain summer calling 30 sec.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Andain summer calling 30 sec.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, I has unique username. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DX-Ball 2 - Screenshot - Stingers 01.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DX-Ball 2 - Screenshot - Stingers 01.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]