User talk:I Love Bridges

Ways to improve Andrew P. McArdle Memorial Bridge

Hi, I'm Fisheriesmgmt. I Love Bridges, thanks for creating Andrew P. McArdle Memorial Bridge!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Great start! Can you add some reliable, secondary sources as references to this article? And don't forget to mention that the bridge is in Massachusetts! Just outside Boston, right? :)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 01:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 04:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I Love Bridges (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I tagged a few of my own pages as hoaxes when I realized that there was some false information. They were successfully deleted. However, my account is NOT a vandalism account because the page I created Andrew P. McArdle Memorial Bridge is a real bridge in the Boston area and it was deleted with a blatant hoax tag on it. I am demanding explanation! I Love Bridges (talk) 19:07, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are not in a position to be demanding anything here. Per Bbb23, you're going to need a better explanation of what happened, why, and how you intend to contribute productively. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You created a lot of hoax articles, even assuming one of them was not. You didn't tag any of those articles as hoaxes. An IP did for some of them. If that was you, you shouldn't edit while not logged in. Some of the articles, though, you didn't tag for deletion. Indeed, they weren't tagged at all, and I deleted them on my own once I saw your rather dismal track record. You need to elaborate more on your explanation as to what happened and why.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:24, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Some of those pages I honestly completely forgot about. I created some of those pages based on what I knew. When I searched the web to verify what I wrote, I said to myself "Oops! Looks like that information is false". I went in and tagged as many pages as I could remember the next day. However, when I went back to tag some of the other pages I originally forgot, they were already deleted. How do I undo a deletion action so I can correct the information without retyping the whole page?
- Sorry, funny guy, but no information about your made-up bridges exists on the web other than links to the now-deleted articles. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:38, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your email

You are welcome to request an unblock via WP:UTRS if you want another opinion. Given the massive amount of disruption you caused, your repeated lies and trolling on IRC, the fake artices and untrue information added to genuine articles, the problems that ranged from spam to copyright violations and most everything in between, I don't think your block is one that can be resolved by merely waiting it out. The fact that you use a throwaway email address does not inspire the least confidence either. Huon (talk) 01:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

I Love Bridges (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16080 was submitted on Jul 03, 2016 23:23:32. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 23:23, 3 July 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

I Love Bridges (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16337 was submitted on Aug 15, 2016 15:36:41. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:36, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]