User talk:I Have Always Been a Twin

Welcome!

Hello, I Have Always Been a Twin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete User:I Have Always Been a Twin/sandbox

Speedy deletion nomination of User:I Have Always Been a Twin/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:I Have Always Been a Twin/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Created article for Leesa and Laura Andrew

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. I Have Always Been a Twin (talk) 17:46, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Leesa and Laura Andrew

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Leesa and Laura Andrew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 17:52, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Alison DiLaurentis, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 18:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively you may add {{Db-u1}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. Thank you. Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 16:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Liz and Julia Nolan, you may be blocked from editing. The passage about Christopher Nolan makes absolutely no sense, and it suggests that you are not here to provide constructive edits to the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 17:55, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Squared (TV series)

A tag has been placed on Squared (TV series) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Other than the fact that Louis Tomlinson is in it, it doesn't state why the web series is significant or notable to have a article.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🎼Yexstorm2001🎼 (talk) 16:21, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thompson Twins

Hi, several issues with your edits - first of all your referencing (which was highlighted previously). You cannot wikilink a page of a person as a reference as you did with the Thompson Twins DOBs. If that person did reveal one of their DOBs, you need a reliable and independent source that anyone can verify. Check WP:RS. Secondly, I had to remove one of your additions. The following paragraph makes no sense to me.

American Juniors was originally Tori Thompson, but since her older sister Taylor was also born in Halloween and was the one old enough to be Danielle White and Lucy Hale, and Hale is One Direction, Taylor was not part of the 1988 births and class years of 2006, 2008, 2010, and 2012 at all and also not the 1992 births' high school class of 2010 either and is about to die like Jax Cole is of thyroid cancer for that, Taylor had to be included in The Thompson Sisters for child entertainer Tori, who is in the 1994-births' class like they are supposed to be so Tori is not going to die.

I don't want to discourage your efforts, however I would like to draw your attention to the need for reliable sources, and all information to be verifiable and referenced. If you need any help with this, please message me back or drop in to the WP:Teahouse. Rayman60 (talk) 22:36, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Bring It On: In It to Win It are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jennifer Tisdale. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 16:31, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rosalie Mackenzie Poe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rosalie Mackenzie Poe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 16:37, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rybka twins with no crop function allowed on my computer.png

A tag has been placed on File:Rybka twins with no crop function allowed on my computer.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 17:00, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rybka twins with no crop function allowed 2.png

A tag has been placed on File:Rybka twins with no crop function allowed 2.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 17:00, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dunkirk (2017 film), you may be blocked from editing. It's not a remake of the 1958 movie. And since both are set in 1940, it's not the present. Crboyer (talk) 21:14, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm WyrmVane. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Little Mix, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. WyrmVane (talk) 14:06, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have also undone your edit to Elliott Yamin. You added a category where there is no support for the claim anywhere in the process. You must provide reliable sources for claims like that. —C.Fred (talk) 15:04, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tomlinson Sisters

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tomlinson Sisters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 15:05, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let me be direct with this warning

You added Category:Deaf musicians to Elliott Yamin.

Nowhere else in the article does it say he's deaf. No source cited in the article mentions this.

Your edit was undone because it is unsourced. You may not add unsourced material to articles. This is even more important when the article is about a person who is alive; the rules are much stricter then.

You keep making bad edits like this; these bad edits are becoming a problem.

You may be blocked if you keep making bad edits. If that happens, you will not be allowed to edit any article on Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 02:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Cher Lloyd. There are no sources to support that she is related to any of the twins you named. There's no need to compare her to One Direction on that basis in the intro.

In other words, that was another bad edit, and this is your last warning. —C.Fred (talk) 21:13, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Gemma Styles

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Gemma Styles, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 21:42, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Squared (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by C.Fred was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Squared (TV series) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Squared and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Squared, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—C.Fred (talk) 21:45, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts are things where there is the possibility of them becoming articles in the future, and they're being worked on. Since there's already an article about Squared, we don't need to create a new draft about it. Articles about any of the people on the show would need to be written about the people, not just rehashing the show. —C.Fred (talk) 21:55, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do need it to be a draft now, but life is very fast-paced lately as I was the wikipedian user talk pages and talk pages in general both of them not YouTube's and also not The Amanda Show's online videos. What do I think of Vimeo and Dailymotion instead of Facebook? Metacafe. I Have Always Been a Twin (talk) 21:58, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A draft is not your private sandbox. Further, it doesn't look like you're working on a plausible article: "they are needed to make a half hour television show since humans cannot tell time without tongues" sounds like total nonsense. —C.Fred (talk) 22:07, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi I Have Always Been a Twin can I invite you to try the Wikipedia Adventure. I found it a really good way to learn how to edit Wikipedia. WyrmVane (talk) 00:06, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:32, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Squared2 (web series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Squared2 (web series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squared2 (web series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.WyrmVane (talk) 23:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]