User talk:I (Dream,Plan & Achieve)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:32, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible sock account: User talk:IDIPIA

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:33, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I (Dream,Plan & Achieve) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So just guide me to write it as neutral point of view instead of deleting it just change the text you thought was of a promotion type. This company is notable they are doing such a great job got all the education system of India online to guide students who are in a dilemma can't find their way to the desired career. If any text is need to change just change by yourself make it available then tell me i will change it completely but just deleting it is not a good thing and also unblock me to have a chat or to send a message on your talk page

Decline reason:

You have not addressed any of the problems which led to the block; you have not offered to change your username to one which complies with Wikipedia policy, and far from indicating that you will not promote your business, you even posted further promotional text about it in your unblock request ("doing such a great job.." etc). Before you consider making another unblock request, I suggest carefully re-reading the section of the unblock notice which begins "If you have no interest in writing about some other topic..." The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:43, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you related in any way to User talk:IDIPIA? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:12, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I (Dream,Plan & Achieve) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How can i edit other articles till i m blocked and the expiry has not been set and again i ' m asking if there is any problem in the text you know better than me you can edit it or just tell me i will edit it myself and wanted to write about this page and i and just saying that this is a notable work just guide how i can write about this simple and even suggest a new username because if i will do anything on my own there will be again some problem which i don't want so be my guide suggest me how to write you are having all the content being an admin i think you can help and can unblock me. I just wanted to clear myself don't misunderstand me it's a request it is not about promotion if any of the text is found in that manner just change it or tell me i will surely change it if not then you have the power to block or to delete. So kindly help me sir we can also talk in private just give me your e-mail i will send you the whole content and you can look over it what is needed to be change

Decline reason:

Firstly, you need to change your username to a name that is unconnected to any organisation or product, so for your next unblock request you should use the text:
{{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}

Secondly, I am unconvinced that you should be editing articles where you have a significant conflict of interest. PhilKnight (talk) 15:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I (Dream,Plan & Achieve) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Tdsd (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I just wanted to clear myself don't misunderstand me it's a request it is not about promotion if any of the text is found in that manner just change it or tell me i will surely change it if not then you have the power to block or to delete. So kindly help me sir we can also talk in private just give me your e-mail i will send you the whole content and you can look over it what is needed to be change and it is not about COI i really want to contribute just review my content first unblock me and the page afterwards tell be the notable editing needed and will surely rewrite it and just help me along writing the page and articles

Decline reason:

As it is clear that you have several accounts here, in a manner not acceptable within Wikipedia guidelines, I have declined your request pending a satisfactory explanation of your usage of multiple accounts.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:09, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that we only discuss in private by email what must be kept private. I feel that you do have a conflict of interest - and probably another account here too User:Tripat Deep. You certainly know that user well enough to have edited their user page. By the way, I've undone your two changes to Maria Chudakova. 'Titleholder' is quite acceptable without either a space or a hyphen, and the comma you inserted was not needed. Peridon (talk) 17:52, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And, of course, there's the User:IDIPIA account as well. I've blocked Tripat Deep as a sockpuppet of IDIPIA which I feel certain this account is too. Peridon (talk) 17:59, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone through the edits of 'Tripat Deep' and removed a lot more quite unnecessary tiny changes, of the same type as I mentioned above. Peridon (talk) 18:09, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One more, for the record: User:Tripatdua. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:10, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think that might be the oldest (so far...). Peridon (talk) 18:16, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peridon Now will you help me with the solution just undo delete the pages and do editing as per need and rest tell me i will do it my self and will try my level best not to repeat any kind of this mistakes in future. You are king enough to review and check the page so just edit and undo delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by I (Dream,Plan & Achieve) (talk • contribs) 04:42, 16 April 2015‎

There is no question of restoring the deleted pages that you created, as they were blatant attempts to use Wikipedia for promotion, telling the world what a good thing your web site is, and what a wonderful person you are. That is not what Wikipedia is for, and there are no two ways about it.
You created this account (and others) in order to evade a block on another account. If you are blocked, that means you are not allowed to edit Wikipedia: it does not mean that you are welcome to edit as long as you change to a different account.
There is no question of unblocking you as long as it seems that your intention is to do the same kind of thing that led to your being blocked, namely writing to tell the word all about yourself and your work, how wonderful your web site is, and so on. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:53, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have just checked the editing history of your accounts, and I have found another good reason why you should not be unblocked. Apart from your promotional editing, almost all of your editing has consisted of replacing perfectly good English with English which is ungrammatical or wrongly punctuated. This wastes time for other editors who have to go round correcting your mistakes. You clearly do not have a good enough grasp of English to edit an English language encyclopaedia. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:15, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]