Jump to content

User talk:INDV100

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Although some prefer welcoming newcomers with cookies, I find fruit to be a healthier alternative.

Hello, INDV100, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Why can't I edit some particular pages?
Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.
Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?
How do I create an article?
See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.
How do I create citations?
  1. Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
  2. Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
  3. In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
  4. Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
  5. Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
  6. In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
  7. If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?
A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Changing of images on Narendra Modi

[edit]

Please stop changing the image on the page. The current image has consensus and if you would like to change it you have to start a discussion on the talk page. Reverting edits ad nauseam will get you nowhere. Prolix 💬 06:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unrelated images

[edit]

Please stop adding unrelated images to Statue of Unity. Stick to adding images that are relevant to the article alone to reduce clutter. Prolix 💬 06:58, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Narendra Modi, you may be blocked from editing. Prolix 💬 18:04, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Narendra Modi. If you change the infobox image again without consensus you WILL be blocked for disruptive editing Prolix 💬 18:05, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Manish Sisodia. Walrus Ji (talk) 15:26, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Arambagh (Lok Sabha constituency), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Walrus Ji (talk) 15:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Prolix 💬 08:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sdg100. Fences&Windows 00:24, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

[edit]

UTRS decline

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "
 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Thank you for your attention to these matters. Please see UTRS appeal #39252

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I know the date of unblock ? INDV100 (talk) 05:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's no unblock date. This block is indefinite. --Yamla (talk) 10:44, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

INDV100 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I think what I have done that was completely unfair, but if I have been unblocked, I would try to discuss with the users and administrators about using the new image. But I request to unblock me and also I again do apologize for that.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:44, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

INDV100 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The block was necessary and I do understand it and also if I have been unblocked, I would not continue to make such damage or disruptions, also if I have been unblocked, I would try to make more useful contributions

Decline reason:

This sockpuppet account will not be unblocked. You may use your original account. ST47 (talk) 06:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. INDV100 (talk) 06:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

INDV100 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Is there any way that I can be unblocked if I assure that it won't happen any more ?. INDV100 (talk) 08:05, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. You have been told what to do. I have removed your ability to edit this page. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 09:40, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:India Post Logo.png listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:India Post Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- DaxServer (talk) 10:19, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:India Post Logo.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:India Post Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]