User talk:IMDABestEVER

October 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to AC/DC has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: AC/DC was changed by IMDABestEVER (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.915651 on 2018-10-18T14:24:10+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:24, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wizard (magazine). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wizard (magazine) was changed by IMDABestEVER (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907553 on 2018-10-18T14:28:26+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:28, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Oregon Ballot Measure 65 (2008), you may be blocked from editing. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 14:30, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Oregon Ballot Measure 65 (2008). ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:31, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 17:54, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IMDABestEVER (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think that my edits were constructive and useful for the world to know. please review your block on my editing priveleges. Thanks, user IMDABestEVER

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked.Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:05, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.