User talk:IIULER Facts

Welcome!

Hello, IIULER Facts, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was India International University of Legal Education and Research of Bar Council of India Trust, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 04:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Johnj1995. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to India International University of Legal Education and Research of Bar Council of India Trust seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir, the revision I made in the article entitled India International University of Legal Education and Research of Bar Council of India Trust is correct and I have all the substantiating evidences. I am an enrolled Attorney in India and I have all the legal backups and substantiating evidences to prove the same. The Institution named India International University of Legal Education and Research (IIULER) Goa is deceiving everyone and I was attaching all the details and evidences herewith. I have a PDF file which contains all evidences with governmental data and gazette notifications. If you wish to go through the same, I can share you that as well@Johnj1995 IIULER Facts (talk) 05:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. FifthFive (talk) 05:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the claims you made are to be included in the article, then they must be verifiable with published reliable sources. Simply put, there needs to have been coverage in (major, national) newspapers. —C.Fred (talk) 14:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at India International University of Legal Education and Research of Bar Council of India Trust, you may be blocked from editing. It is increasingly obvious, both by your username and the edits you have made to the article in question, that you have an agenda against this university. Wikipedia is not a soapbox or platform for you to state your opinions about a subject. —C.Fred (talk) 12:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Editor, please note than I am uploading everything with "governmental documents, gazette notifications, replies from the concerned CPIO's from RTI authorities" of Government of India. I am a qualified Indian Attorney who knows the law and legal system very well. If you want to block me, please do that. I does not have any hidden agenda but the India International University of Legal Education and Research (IIULER) has the same. As a practicing lawyer, I have already disclosed the same with substantiating evidences to the general public. So, please don't try to threaten or frighten me in terms of laws and regulations. It's my freedom of speech and expression to edit and re-edit something "with proper evidences and documents"

I have also attached all the reference links of governmental websites, Higher Educational Institutions and Apex Level Bodies under the Ministry of Education, Government of India as well. I think you people may have some hidden agenda here. Even if proof is attached, you are not willing to go through the same. I think your reply seems to be like a comment in the "Soapbox" which I am not at all interested to revert back.

So, don't consider everyone as a mere puppet. I repeat, as a qualified Indian Attorney who has all the substantiating evidences to prove my stand, I will continue to fight for the justice as so many innocent students are trapped in the web of India International University of Legal Education and Research (IIULER).

Note: If you want to block, please do the same! Don't try to show off by neglecting the facts and proofs which I have put as references in the Article.

Thank You! IIULER Facts (talk) 14:37, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the statement above, it is reasonable to conclude that you are not here to create an encyclopedia written from neutral point of view. If you wish to continue editing, I suggest you edit on topics other than IIULER. —C.Fred (talk) 03:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for not being here to build an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advocacy or opinion pieces.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:40, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]