User talk:IIIEB4YK

Your submission at Articles for creation: ZeroTier (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ZeroTier and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 07:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello! IIIEB4YK, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 07:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. If I'd seen this first, I would have deleted on sight, but since you've asked my opinion I'll give you a limited time to see if you can fix it. Problems. I deleted your article because

• it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. You have no independent third-party references
• There is no evidence that the software meets the linked notability criteria, and I note that it is only a few months old.
• it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: that is capable of establishing connections between devices behind NAT as if they were on the same local network. Endpoint connections are peer-to-peer (after initial route discovery via root servers) and end-to-end encrypted. Also, your external links should be one link to the main website, nothing else
• If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. In particular, if you work directly or indirectly for the software organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:IIIEB4YK. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=IIIEB4YK|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read this important guidance. You must also reply to the COI request above.

If you decide that you can't show that it meets the notability criteria with proper refs, let me know. If it isn't improved, I'll delete it in the near future anyway Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! Replied on your user talk page -- IIIEB4YK (talk) 21:48, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I've removed two incorrect ELs, I'm not convinced that the others serve a useful purpose. I'm still not convinced that the product has been shown to be notable, or that all of your refs are necessarily RS, but I'm happy to leave that to the AfD reviewers now Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:23, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ZeroTier (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Atsme was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ZeroTier and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ZeroTier, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

^{Atsme📞📧} 22:36, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:ZeroTier concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:ZeroTier, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Draft:ZeroTier concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:ZeroTier, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:ZeroTier

Hello, IIIEB4YK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ZeroTier".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:39, 30 June 2020 (UTC)