User talk:IHaveAColdThatsAwesome

Invincijesutanium

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Invincijesutanium. Your test worked, and has been or will soon be removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (aeropagitica) 20:15, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not repost speedily deleted material. This is considered vandalism and can lead to you being blocked from editing for a period of time. (aeropagitica) 21:44, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jesu-Hercucles

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. (aeropagitica) 21:43, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invincijesutanium²

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Invincijesutanium, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --NMChico24 21:45, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to NMChico24 regarding Invincijesutanium

I didn't vandalize Invincijesutanium, I created that page. (IHaveAColdThatsAwesome 21:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Category:Invincijesutanium

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (aeropagitica) 21:46, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Marth (Fire Emblem)

Regarding your category "People who carry swords": please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Marth (Fire Emblem), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Patstuart 22:44, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY to Patstuart

That was NOT nonsense I added to Marth (Fire Emblem). I added that page to a category to which it rightfully belongs. I may have been fooling around before with by ridiculous pages, but I'm not doing that any more. That got old REALLY fast. I am now only going to provide material which is factual. (IHaveAColdThatsAwesome 22:47, 1 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]

OK, this may be true, but you can understand my skepticism. The category is, honestly, quite in nature with most of your previous edits, which were all silly and vandal related. -Patstuart 22:49, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly I can understand, but I promise I'm done with nonsense edits. It just got really boring and stupid. (IHaveAColdThatsAwesome 22:53, 1 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I see you deleted the entire category, Patstuart. Here's hoping your computer crashes. (IHaveAColdThatsAwesome 22:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Actually, I didn't delete it. I don't have the authority. But someone else with more authority did delete it. -Patstuart 22:59, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. (aeropagitica) 23:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People who carry swords

This category is currently nominated for deletion at the above link. The category is not particularly well-formed or useful, as it doesn't describe the type of person carrying the sword - historical, fictional, science-fictional - all of them? It also sets a dangerous precedent as if this exists then why not a category for people who carry guns? That would be so large as to be useless. Please read Wikipedia:Categorization to understand the concept. (aeropagitica) 23:07, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]