User talk:IGG8998

Elvis Presley

Please disengage from the Elvis Presley discussion unless you have constructive criticism to offer and reliable, verifiable sources to back it up. At this point, your involvement is bordering on disruptive. --Andy Walsh (talk) 18:36, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you may have a look at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Elvis Presley/archive4. What is your opinion about the present state of the Elvis article? Onefortyone (talk) 15:46, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Ocean's Eleven (1960 film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WCityMike 18:33, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Ocean's Eleven (1960 film), you may be blocked from editing. WCityMike 18:33, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Peter Lawford, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Further, trivia sections are discouraged per WP:TRIVIA Pinkadelica ^♣ 15:41, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care if "it's a fact!". The actual fact of the matter remains that you added unsourced content to an article under the heading of trivia. Trivia sections are discouraged in all articles and any content you add to an article needs to be accompanied by a reliable source. That is Wikipedia policy. End of. Pinkadelica ^♣ 15:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:59, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moving articles

Hi , your move of Peter Falk has been reverted, may I suggest you add a talkpage comment to see if editors support the move and then after a day or two if there are no objections move it then - Off2riorob (talk) 20:42, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it hasn't been reverted yet, but I expect it will be soon. The rest of Rob's comment still applies, though. :-)--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:15, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mark Lund (actor)

The article Mark Lund (actor) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. S_peakF_ree ^(talk)_(contribs) 15:54, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What did you think about the deletion notice you received?

Hi IGG8998,

In December you received a message about either "Nomination for deletion" or "Proposed deletion" of an article you created. I'd like to ask you a few quick questions:

Was the message helpful? Were the instructions clear and easy to follow?
If not, how do you think the message could be improved?
What do you think about the deletion process in general? Do you understand how to contest a deletion?

You can feel free to answer on my talk page or send me your response by email (mpinchukwikimedia.org). (I won't quote you or link your answers to your username if you don't feel comfortable with that.) Your feedback is incredibly useful for improving the content of deletion notifications, so please take a minute to think about and answer these questions. Thank you! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:47, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

John Marston (disambiguation)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give John Marston (disambiguation) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Tassedethe (talk) 22:42, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]