User talk:IAMYOURMOTHER

Your submission at Articles for creation: Savagerealm (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Savagerealm and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Savagerealm, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IAMYOURMOTHER! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Of your ten edits to article space, you've got maybe two that weren't vandalism (and I'm not counting you reverting your own vandalism in that total). Ian.thomson (talk) 20:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to read this before responding again. If you act up again, I can and will revoke your talk page access. Appealing this block is very simple:

Stop cussin' at people. Act like an adult.
Let us know you understand that what you did was wrong, explaining in detail what you specifically did wrong.
Explain how you plan to avoid engaging in those behaviors again.
Explain what kind of behaviors you will engage in instead.

The above list isn't 100% guaranteed to succeed, but doing anything else is 100% guaranteed to fail, and going against the first bullet point will get your account completely locked. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:19, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IAMYOURMOTHER (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Gary, now I know I was wrong I messed up and now you're gone Gary, I'm sorry I neglected you Oh, I never expected you to run away And leave me feeling this empty Your meow right now would sound like music to me Please come home 'cause I miss you, Gary Gary, come home Gary, come home Gary, come home Gary, can't you see I was blind? I'll do anything to change your mind More than a pet, you're my best friend Too cool to forget, come back 'cause we are family And forgive me for making you wanna roam And now, my heart is beating like the saddest metronome Somewhere I hope you're reading my latest three-word poem Gary, come home Gary, come home Gary, come home Gary, come home Gary, come home Gary, won't you come home?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Just Chilling (talk) 00:07, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've removed your access to this talk page. Normally, I'd take this time to explain what UTRS is, but that's all I'm gonna say about that. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:28, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]