User talk:I.zenzero

Welcome!

Hello, I.zenzero, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

AfD nomination of THD method

An article that you have been involved in editing, THD method, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/THD method. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 15:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HAL method (Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation) has been appended to the nomination. The two are being discussed together.Novangelis (talk) 02:11, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - THD method. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at THD method - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Novangelis (talk) 22:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Doppler guided transanal dearterialization

A tag has been placed on Doppler guided transanal dearterialization, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 11:12, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Doppler guided transanal dearterialization, to Wikipedia as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. andy (talk) 11:13, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Doppler guided transanal dearterialization

I have nominated Doppler guided transanal dearterialization, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doppler guided transanal dearterialization. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. andy (talk) 12:05, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:58, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hemorrhoids mini-invasive treatment

A tag has been placed on Hemorrhoids mini-invasive treatment, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Nat Gertler (talk) 11:54, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have simply become a pain in the arse for persistently trying to write about your haemorrhoid treatment. You have made no attempt to improve the text or enter into discussions about the article. I have blocked you briefly. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:48, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wikibin.org/articles/thd-method.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:23, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block

As soon as the block expired, you reposted. I have blocked you indefinitely this time. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:36, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I.zenzero (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi there, our account has been blocked a few weeks ago and I would appreciate it if someone could kindly review this block. I started working for the press office of THD a few days ago and I have now re-written the article. As you can see also in the bibliography indicated below, this medical procedure is a proven and recognized treatment of hemorrhoids and should be mentioned a) among the other procedures to cure hemorrhoids (here: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Hemorrhoid) and b) in a separate page with a short article, explaining the treatment (such a page has already been approved and published for the other surgical procedures, for example here: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Stapled_hemorrhoidectomy). The new article has not been written in a promotional tone, but for informational purposes about the possible treatments available for patients. Please find the re-written article at User:I.zenzero/THD, any comments or suggestions for improvement are appreciated. Thanks!

Decline reason:

Although you have made some efforts to make the article look less obviously promotional, it is still perfectly clear that your purpose is to gain coverage for a subject in which you have a conflict of interest. Editing in order to get coverage on behalf of a business or organisation you work for is not acceptable. Since you have given no indication at all that you intend to do any editing other than this, I see no reason to think that unblocking would benefit Wikipedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:19, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi! Wikipedia does not publish press releases, and under the conflict of interest guidelines, we all agree to avoid writing about ourselves or our own businesses. Don't worry- if this really is a notable subject, it is truly inevitable that people outside of the press office will write about it. Now that you know that you won't be writing about your own business, do you still want to be unblocked? As long as you're agreeing to avoid writing about the subject of your employer, we could certainly use a volunteer with your medical knowledge at Wikipedia. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:00, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also the page will need further work before it is ready for the main space. It must be based on only review article and needs to have inline citations per WP:MEDRS. These are formatted by putting the refs between <ref>...</ref>. Also refs need to be formatted properly. This tool [1] work well. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:05, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to be a bit more merciful but I will follow FisherQueen's line: you have a blatant COI. Wait until a disinterested editor writes about this subject. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:10, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]