User talk:I.cavaleru

Welcome!

Hi I.cavaleru! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Pathworkzerone (talk) 15:43, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:HIJACK

Per WP:HIJACK, "when changing referenced content, add a new reference, or remove the original reference if it's erroneous and replace it with a {{citation needed}} tag, preferably an explained one". Changing or adding numbers, without explaining or referencing where they come from, is not in keeping with the WP:VER. Guliolopez (talk) 17:58, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Norway, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Updates to HDI values should be done with an updated reference EvergreenFir (talk) 18:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bucharest, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:22, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Romania, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 06:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Romania. tgeorgescu (talk) 17:22, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Romania shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. tgeorgescu (talk) 17:23, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you here for colaberation?

WP:NOTHERE! Moxy- 05:33, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Borsoka (talk) 11:12, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Hi please check out MOS:INFOBOX before making substantial edits to infoboxes DiSantis19 (talk) 18:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]