User talk:I.Mou

I.Mou, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi I.Mou! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 17:02, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:02, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 740 Project (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dlohcierekim was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:740 Project and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:50, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I.Mou, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as IMoumou (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you are in fact the product manager of 740, you need to read and follow the instructions at WP:Paid. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I actually was questioned about this in the Live Chat, my old account was IMoumou, I forgot my password for that one and made IMou. In terms of the "product manager," After I submitted an article, it was deleted for something, I wanted someone to explain why so I can understand and learn and make better articles and also edit better. I asked my firend who claimed that she has experience with submitting articles and that they "take you serious if you work with a company or have experience with what your talking about," so yes (I know its bad but I tried it), so the "product manager" is a false statement to see if she was right and if someone would assist me. I explained that to the people in the chat (which I have screenshots and am looking to report because I was really insulted), and they didn't believe me. I made a mistake and explained that.

Pardon me if this is rude, but it's hard to see where to go with this "false statement " business. After you claimed to be a "production manager" or whatever, it is natural to assume you are being paid to edit on Wikipedia. Who is this friend? She ought to know that "have experience" bit sounds bogus. That's just not how it works. What few articles I've written have nothing to do with my professional life or experience. They were built with verifiable information from reliable sources. That's how articles are built. Personal "experience" is meaningless unless it's supported this way. You seem very determined to create an article about this company you may or may not work for. As it was WP:CSD#G11 material, it was unsalvageable and would need to be completely rewritten, in neutral wording, with verifiable information from reliable sources. Is there any other area or subject you would like to edit about? We have many, many articles in need of improvement.

As to why the original was deleted, I would like to refresh your memory There was a discussion about that here. It is striking how similar the first two paragraphs of the 2nd iteration are to the 1st iteration. I see a notice that you have again contacted me on my talk page. I've been slowly typing this message and have not read that one. It would be better, I think, to continue our conversation on this page. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay perfect! I will write more articles on diff topics to practice. Another wiki member gave me the wiki link of articles that need editing! Thank you