User talk:I'm on a 'Bolo patrol'

Bolo!--I'm on a 'Bolo patrol' (talk) 01:18, 17 June 2008 (UTC) So am I!--86.29.249.114 (talk) 19:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Hi there, Welcome to wikipedia. But I've undone some of edits: e.g. images are have cats in commons. Plz stop using Catagory:WWII because it's a "parent catagory". Thank you Sebastian scha. (talk) 20:11, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified. If it has not been already, it may be removed if the category has not been deemed correct for the subject matter. Thank you. Sebastian scha. (talk)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User:Lucy C. V. Robinson has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you.

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Category:Sexy babes!, you will be blocked from editing. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:53, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 2005 Hertfordshire Oil Storage Terminal fire. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Sebastian scha. (talk) 14:07, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Soviet Central Asia. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:34, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

NawlinWiki (talk) 20:25, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia{{#if:User talk:I'm on a 'Bolo patrol'|, as you did to :{{[[User talk:I'm on a 'Bolo patrol' ]]}}. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Don't swair on a talk page. --86.29.240.38 (talk) 20:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He's a poo-poo--86.29.247.151 (talk) 00:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC)![reply]

Socks

This account is a sockpuppet of Elspeth Monro (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

--86.29.243.73 (talk) 14:50, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--86.29.251.199 (talk) 14:27, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Ba-20 armored car.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Ba-20 armored car.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Ba-20 armored car.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrtirs (talk) 02:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Cristina Fernández de Kirchner - Foto Oficial 2.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Cristina Fernández de Kirchner - Foto Oficial 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Cristina Fernández de Kirchner - Foto Oficial 2.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrtirs (talk) 04:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]