User talk:Hyperx1000

Welcome...

Hello, Hyperx1000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Pavlor (talk) 17:18, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of great powers by date

Hi, I see there is some edit-warring in this template. If your edit is reverted by several other editors, the best course of action would be to discuss the issue at the article/template talkpage (per WP:BRD). Pavlor (talk) 17:19, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template edit-warring/vandalism

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:List of great powers by date, you may be blocked from editing. Pavlor (talk) 05:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Union of Soviet Sovereign Republics have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Union of Soviet Sovereign Republics was changed by Hyperx1000 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894746 on 2021-06-27T02:32:39+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:32, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI re: Talk:Krasnovodsk

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 05:14, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

I've had quite enough. You have not provided a single source for any of your edits, you seem not to know what a reliable source is, and your disruption at Türkmenbaşy, Turkmenistan was unspeakable.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hyperx1000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I found the sources for why that article should be renamed to Krasnovodsk. Hyperx1000 (talk) 22:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't address the reasons for your block, including the confirmed socking per Jpgordon's note below.Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:17, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note to unblocking admin: Because this person was socking as recently as three minutes before this request, I've elevated this to a checkuser block. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 23:13, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hyperx1000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will use the talk page for disputes and providing sources from now on. Hyperx1000 (talk) 01:20, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A little late when the last unblock noted that you've been trying to evade the block. You will have to address that, as well, in any future requests. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.