User talk:HyperBlossom
PPG episodes
[edit]Why are you bringing those back? They have no possible content besides a plot summary, so they don't need articles. There is also WP:EPISODE which states that they only need episodes if actual content, sourced by reliable sources, can be written. You should focus your effort on the actual list, and push to make it a featured list. Nemu 18:01, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- What was the point of that? The answer to both of those questions is "no." They're not being redirected just because they're stubs; it's because they will never be expanded past a plot summary. Nemu 18:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I did a quick search on google, and not to my surprise, none of the episodes I searched for came up with anything relevant. After that, the only possible source is DVD commentary, and it's unlikely they'll bother with a bunch of ten minute episodes. Even if it does contain info, it'll still not be enough to warrant an article. You're saying that they're notable, so you should prove that they are, not me. The burden of proof is on you at this point. Nemu 18:45, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- I went through about ten pages for three episodes, and around five for a few others. If not one single decent source can be found in all of that, how can there actually be any? Once again, if you state they're notable, the burden of proof is on you. The lack of sources is good enough to see that nothing will ever happen to expand the pages. Nemu 01:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- For each PPG episode, the summaries need to be long enough, and there should also be a screenshot for each episode (ONE screenshot for each episode at a time). --PJ Pete
- I went through about ten pages for three episodes, and around five for a few others. If not one single decent source can be found in all of that, how can there actually be any? Once again, if you state they're notable, the burden of proof is on you. The lack of sources is good enough to see that nothing will ever happen to expand the pages. Nemu 01:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I did a quick search on google, and not to my surprise, none of the episodes I searched for came up with anything relevant. After that, the only possible source is DVD commentary, and it's unlikely they'll bother with a bunch of ten minute episodes. Even if it does contain info, it'll still not be enough to warrant an article. You're saying that they're notable, so you should prove that they are, not me. The burden of proof is on you at this point. Nemu 18:45, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)