Jump to content

User talk:Hurricanehink/Archive 20

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Huh?

[edit]

On the infoboxes, when I put in 136 mph (155 mph), it comes up as Category 5.

I thought 156+ was a Category 5, not 155 mph?

TropicalAnalystwx13 22:36, 1 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk • contribs)

Guidence

[edit]

Can u come on IRC tonight at some point during Saturday afternoon or evening (UTC+1) please. I need some guidence with that newsletter that you and Mitch wanted me to develop and Mitchazenia's has not really been around.Jason Rees (talk) 00:57, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

Hi,

I've noticed, when using a storms picture, you guys use certain types. Do they have to be like that? Because, I have some really cool images that I can upload for Earl, Igor, Alex, and a lot, lot, more.

Thanks, 

  TropicalAnalystwx13 22:41, 2 October 2010 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk • contribs)
link HurricaneSpin (talk · contribs) 04:44, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone yemyin

[edit]

Since u made this article in 2007 i just want to say that it was a "severe cyclonic storm" or a weak category 1 hurricane...The IMD didnt payed attention to it due to the conflict between PAK-INDO.. I have some ref that prove that it was a weak hurricane as it had a eye like structure and its winds touched 69mph in Karachi, the JTWC also said that its a sevre cyclonic storm and its wind speed is 60mph NOT 40mph as said by IMD...So should i change it???15jan19932010 (talk) 05:03, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the IMD did pay attention to the system and thus you shouldn't change the windspeeds as the IMD are the official warning center for the region and they who we go with regardless of what other warning centers say. Also i severely doubt that the IMD didn't pay attention to it due to the conflict between Pakistan-India. Though we can mention the windspeeds from PMD in the MH.Jason Rees (talk) 15:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category 5

[edit]

Hi Is not true. I readed a page and says that hurricane category 4 is winds speed from 131-154 and i downloaded the hurricane igor kmz track for google earth from national hurricane center and says that 155 is category 5.

Here is the link http://library.thinkquest.org/CR0212900/id4.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khaled98 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hurricane igor

[edit]

Here the link for hurricane igor track. You need google earth.

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/gis/best_track/al112010_best_track.kmz —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khaled98 (talk • contribs) 20:00, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GAR for Sam Oldham

[edit]

Thanks for taking the time to review my GA nomination Sam Oldham, I've fixed the issues you mentioned. Please have another look now. Thanks! Strange Passerby (talk • c • status) 06:37, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RSMC/TCWC/WMO meeting

[edit]

Per facebook: ftp://ftp.bom.gov.au/anon/home/qld/annf/TCM_6/TCM6_presentations/ Jason Rees (talk) 04:30, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Illinois (album)

[edit]

As the most recent reviewer of the article, I wanted to get your opinion of its current state. Diff comparing article from close of last FAC to now: [1]. I have thus far been unable to find information about Stevens' motivation for the long song titles, but I feel otherwise it is substantially more comprehensive than when you reviewed it. I'm considering re-nominating the article at FAC, but I thought I should get your opinion first. Thanks! Jujutacular talk 02:58, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you have any further concerns, feel free to comment at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Illinois (album)/archive3. Thanks! Jujutacular talk 14:59, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific typhoon

[edit]

Would you mind starting your comment with '''Support''' so your vote is clear? Thanks. --Born2cycle (talk) 22:47, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I ain't voting for nothing! ;) (see WP:VOTE) Hurricanehink (talk) 22:51, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Otto

[edit]

Would you mind doing a reassessment for Hurricane Otto? I feel it could be more than C-class now, but I want to see other opinions on it first. Thanks in advance. 190.4.148.31 (talk) 17:59, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting (mainly references) and quality of writing keep it at C-class. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 18:02, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IRC

[edit]

Just wondering Are you avoiding the channel for any particular reason?Jason Rees (talk) 16:37, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - Just seemed strange that we have the strongest pacific typhoon since Yuri 91 and your not around :P.Jason Rees (talk) 16:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Haha - if only that were true:P.Jason Rees (talk) 16:48, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just to show you how wrong you were, two ex members of WPTC came back tonight on IRC :P.Jason Rees (talk) 02:28, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not even close Hink, people care what the WPAC. I was also wondering why you where not on IRC too. BTW, I replaced Paine 86 with the 1987 PHS. YE Tropical Cyclone 16:56, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Somehow, I forgot to thank you for your help with the peer review of Bartow, Florida. I really appreciate the time you spent helping my improve the article. After correcting the errors made (I was fortunate enough to have four people who have FA experience), I have submitted it as a GA nominee. Thanks once again and sorry for the delayed thanks. VictorianMutant(Talk) 07:57, 28 October 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Hurricanehink. You have new messages at VictorianMutant's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cyclone Giri

[edit]

I used to do that, but when i realized people are changing everything i put in, i was dissapointed and discouraged, so i tought it was best for me to wait for other to finish those things. --Anirudh EmaniSay something 16:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hurricane Richard (2010)

[edit]

Sorry about that, I was in a rush at the time. I probably shouldn't have made the edit rather than make it as quickly as possible so I could get to my next class. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:25, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't forget to convert it that time! The first source for $18 million is for infrastructure, the second was for Agriculture in Belize dollars so I converted it to USD (which came to be $16.7 million) and added the two together. It was just a coincidence that the combination of the two happened to be very similar to the Belize dollar total for agriculture. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:27, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't matter now, different (and more recent source) contradicts what I found.... Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:28, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ping

[edit]

Hi, I've emailed you about F and A. Tony (talk) 03:43, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

it's t-shirt time!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.170.206.41 (talk) 21:38, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

Do you do adoptions? :P I'd be really interested in becoming your adoptee; I really look up to you. I'm currently adopted, but I wouldn't mind requesting a cancellation since I barely ever talk to or even come across my current adopter. Let me know if you're interested -- Hylian Auree (talk) 23:52, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! That all makes sense, yeah. I really admire your articles, so to learn from you would be a great honor, ha. I'll try to frequent the chat; it seems pretty interesting. Hylian Auree (talk) 04:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
P.S, I like people with high standards since I set relatively high ones myself. Be as crucial as you want ;) Hylian Auree (talk) 04:24, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That all made sense, yeah. However, I do think the S naming bit is somewhat notable, plus it's a nice addition to the lead. In which section(s) should trivia normally be put? Hylian Auree (talk) 18:48, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting thing to note

[edit]

Just looking at the latest visible loops of Tomas, it appears that the upper-level circulation has turned into its own system. Is it possible that we could see further development of this split off system? Cyclonebiskit (talk) 18:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not a chance ;) The convection is dying as we speak (type). Hurricanehink (talk) 19:20, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

[edit]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Hurricanehink. You have new messages at Jason Rees's talk page.
Message added 18:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Someone obviously thinks my view is your view Jason Rees (talk) 18:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

[edit]

GAN for Tropical Storm Laura

[edit]

Hello Hurricanehink, I forgot to tell you that I reviewed Tropical Storm Laura (1971) for GA. Overall all you did a good job, but I have a few minor issues before I can pass, see here. I will give you a week to finish, but let me know if you get those tasks complete sooner.--12george1 (talk) 16:19, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Depression Five (2010)

[edit]

Article needs updating with the Tropical Cyclone Report and the NCDC. I've compiled a complete list of damage reports on the article's talk page. According to the NCDC overall damage was $103.7 million. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 17:09, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

[edit]

FLC

[edit]

I just wanted to leave you a note, I left a comment at the FLC regarding sourcing and not sure how clear I came across, if I'm unclear I'd be more than happy to try to clarify my point if need be. Afro (Talk) 10:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moving the conversation about 11e/Hermine onto the main project talk page

[edit]

I have no problem with splitting articles into two for systems which lose TC status, according to the RSMC, during the trip. Realize that Bret/Greg would have to be two articles due to this in addition to Alma/Arthur. In the 1949-1987 period, there are going to be systems where the hurricane centers for the Atlantic and eastern Pacific were not in agreement, such as Fifi/Orlene, or even worse, where there is a TC listed which is not in the other's database, such as the October 1949 crossing. Thegreatdr (talk) 15:29, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

[edit]

Re: 11E

[edit]

The Tropical Cyclone Report for Eleven-E was released.

"In an uncommon occurrence, the low continued northward into the Bay of Campeche on 5 September, where it re-developed and became Atlantic Tropical Storm Hermine."

Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:44, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Timeline of the 2004 Pacific hurricane season/archive1

[edit]

Hi Hurricanehink, any chance you could revisit this FLC and cap any concerns you had which have since been addressed? Are you still in opposition? Cheers, The Rambling Man (talk) 17:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that! The Rambling Man (talk) 17:49, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

[edit]

Reference formatting

[edit]

Just a friendly note, the accessdate and date portions of the {{cite web}} template that you fill out don't comply with WP:MOS. The dates should be written out rather than be in numeric form. ;) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 23:47, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thats news to me - ive always known it that you can use a separate date format in the references. In fact digging into the MOS it says Dates in the format YYYY-MM-DD (like 1976-05-13) are uncommon in English prose and are generally not used in article prose. However, they may be useful in long lists, references, and tables for conciseness and ease of comparison. Jason Rees (talk) 00:06, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You told me otherwise the other day....bah...w/e Cyclonebiskit (talk) 02:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 global storm activity articles

[edit]

Hi. Just an example of potential cleanup work, I made some recent edits to the "late 2010" non-tropical storms article just to make some minor improvements to the phrasing and consistency. I realize that the most recent articles have degraded to the point that most experienced users will not even touch that shi(f)t, but it can still be changed. The AfD currently has 4 deletes, 1 keep/rehaul, and 2 "break down" !votes, and would qualify as a no consensus debate ATM but the articles can still be improved futher. Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 20:42, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, about your question concerning the hemispheres, a "winter storm" article can include year-round winter storms for both the northern hemisphere's winter months and the southern hemisphere's winter months and likewise for the summer storms. ~AH1(TCU) 19:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

[edit]

images

[edit]

Sorry about changing it back, but the picture I put there is better. It shows Emily at her peak, and it has a better view of her eye. Why are you changing it back?--Ryder Busby (talk) 20:59, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I will work on "real" articles, but I still need time to practice writing them. I already changed my sandboxes back so they don't read "such destructive storms", but I thought sandboxes were for my practice articles. And I have posted a comment on the Hurricane Emily (2005) talk page. Please reply. Thank you--Ryder Busby (talk) 21:36, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

/* images */

[edit]

Sorry, but I only changed it because the Hurricane Rita (2005) article says the storm formed September 17, and dissipated September 24. I was only referring to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryder Busby (talk • contribs) 23:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

/* Image */

[edit]

Hey, I posted on Hurricane Emily (2005) talk page. Just letting you know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryder Busby (talk • contribs) 17:07, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I wanted to say sorry for getting all up in your face last night. You may not forgive me,(trust me, I wouldn't be surprised if you didn't), but I still think it's nice to apologize. I also want you to know that the problem with the Emily picture is settled. You can go to Emily's article now to see who won the argument. P.S: Scroll down the article and look for a new picture. Hurricane Emily (2005)--Ryder Busby (talk) 23:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC) Thanks. I hope from now on we won't have any more problems.--Ryder Busby (talk) 04:06, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

Just wanted to know what you thought of one of the maps for Cyclone Waka. I added labels so it's a bit more useful. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 18:38, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Id look at circling Tonga as well since its not that well defined on maps.Jason Rees (talk) 18:51, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I circled Tonga and added another circle for Vava'u (even though it can't be seen) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 19:01, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I like it! :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:17, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I guess that changed your mind about the usefulness of the image :P Cyclonebiskit (talk) 19:19, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Certainly. And btw, NCDC did actually say "flunging". Wordfail. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:28, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

[edit]


YE Tropical Cyclone is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:User:TTTSNB/Merry_Christmas}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Merry Christmas, Hink. YE Tropical Cyclone 23:40, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

images

[edit]

Sorry, I thought it was better. I don't want to start an argument, so I will leave it alone. By the way, are you talking about Hurricane Gilbert or Hurricane Fran?--Ryder Busby (talk) 05:37, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What about Gilbert? Is my picture of Gilbert better or worse? --Ryder Busby (talk) 05:46, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

[edit]

images

[edit]

Okay, but I know everything that is wrong with my Emily picture. You don't have to remind me. What's wrong with the Fran and Rita image?--Ryder Busby (talk) 13:46, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

Okay. Thank you for telling me. So, Gilbert. How about that image? And sorry for replying late, but I've been busy.--Ryder Busby (talk) 06:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's right! I remember you saying that. I've been very busy these past few days, so I may forget something every now and then. Anyway, I will stop with the images. I did try to improve Hurricane Lili (1996) as best as I could, and I will try to improve it some more. Other articles do need editing, so I will get to that. Thanks for everything!--Ryder Busby (talk) 00:31, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hurricanehink/Archive_20&oldid=1144713863"