User talk:Hunter91
{{unblock|there is no vandalsim in my contribs look! and if i was a vandal i would just set up anouther account please unblock me}}
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Hunter91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am being victamised
Decline reason:
Per comment below -- WinHunter (talk) 13:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Hunter91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
where is your evidence if you look at my many edits you can see i am not a 'puppet master' i am being victamised and i dont know why i have realised recently that this is not by accident because this is not the first time this has happend please unblock me and stop the person victamising me
Decline reason:
Evidence perfectly clear. Thanks for coming, but you can go now. ➨ ЯEDVERS 13:11, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You are not being victimised please be assured of that, you where blocked because a check user request concluded you are a possible sock puppet (the case and read the policy regarding socks here) thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 09:21, 11 September 2006 (UTC)