User talk:Hunter61

Welcome!

Hello, Hunter61, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 07:02, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help with the MTG articles! The Ronin 00:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help write an article for Gix?

The Ronin 21:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:LogoBBsimpel.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LogoBBsimpel.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leek masters

All right, I suspected you meant "leek", the plant, but I am dying to know what this root for "leek" is that Lauran Toorians has in mind. I am sorry, but I don't have easy access to that book. By the way, I actually thought the "rabbit" etymology was pretty good (German Kaninchen, Dutch konijn, perhaps also — or alternatively — Proto-Celtic *kasnā- (?) 'hare'), although I didn't put it there and was not aware of it before reading about it in that Wikipedia article. The second part of the compound also has a different analysis, now based on IE. *poti- instead of being presumably connected to German fassen (whose IE etymology is not very clear). Pasquale 21:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translated from Toorians:

The Proto-Celtic must have had a word *kannīnā, meaning “leek”. This word produced like Old-Irish cainnean “leek”, Modern Welsh cennin “leek; daffodils” and Modern Breton kignen “garlic”. Apart from Celtic this “leekword” only seems to have connected words in Slavic languages, so there may be a common (but unknown) non-Indo-european source

The second part of the name is most likely German. Compare Gothic words with faþs: bruþ-faþs “bridegroom”, hunda-faþs “hunderdman, centurio”, þusundi-faþs “thousandman” en swnagoga-fada “(belonging to) he leader of the synagoge”. This faþs is an excellent parallel for Latin fates. It harks back to Proto-Indo-european *potis “master”, similar to Greek pósis ”husband”, and Sanskrit páti “master, husband”. We only have to assume that the original tribename was Cannenefaþ-. Latin didn't know the German th-sound, and wrote it with a t.

I hope that helps! Hunter 03:27, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Map of Dominaria

Hi! I was wondering if you have a version of the map of Dominaria you posted at http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Image:MapDominaria6.jpg without the text. If you do, and you could upload it, I will love you forever. Thanks! EDIT: If you could post it in a lossless format, like PNG, or in whatever the original, presumably layer-y, format was, that'd be even better. Musteval 12:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you give me a mail-adres, I'll mail it to you (it's jpg though). Are you going to reconstuct the globe? Hunter 15:17, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I want it for the Coalition Wargame (http://boards1.wizards.com/forumdisplay.php?f=282). We're looking for a nice new blank map to base things on, and it turns out that you already made it. Yay! You can send it to must.eval@gmail.com. Musteval 20:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Hunter 06:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind removing the copyright symbols from the images you have released into the public domain? It's a little confusing with both. Thanks! -- Norvy (talk) 16:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mittelos Bioscience

An editor has nominated Mittelos Bioscience, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mittelos Bioscience and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 12:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Richard Alpert (Lost)

An editor has nominated Richard Alpert (Lost), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Alpert (Lost) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 12:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Elija Allen

An editor has nominated Elija Allen, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elija Allen and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 12:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jonas Mittelos

An editor has nominated Jonas Mittelos, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonas Mittelos and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 12:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mittelos website is a fake

I don't know if you've realised this by now, but the Mittelos website is a fake. See [1]. Please don't add information from that site to articles. fraggle 09:14, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dominaria maps

Regarding the various maps of Dominaria you've uploaded on Wikipedia: I really like these maps, but I have a few questions about them and their copyright status that need answering for the sake of Wikipedia's rules on image use. Did you create these yourself? If so, what was your source? In other words, how do we know the borders are accurate? If not, who created them? How do we know the creator has released them into the public domain? —Lowellian (reply) 17:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For original maps, go here Ashtok 19:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BB1-bewoners.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BB1-bewoners.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 16:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tara Playboy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tara Playboy.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 16:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BB3-bewoners3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BB3-bewoners3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 16:31, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:LogoBBBattle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LogoBBBattle.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 16:31, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BewonersBB5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BewonersBB5.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 16:32, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo-veronica.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo-veronica.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 16:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:LogoBBsimpel.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LogoBBsimpel.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 16:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Big Brother Second Life

I have nominated Big Brother Second Life, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Brother Second Life. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tresiden (talk) 21:29, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Serra's Realm

The article Serra's Realm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Serra's Realm – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 05:02, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Hunter61! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Bridget Maasland - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rosalie van Breemen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:05, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Taysir (Magic: The Gathering)

The article Taysir (Magic: The Gathering) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for fictional characters.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 23:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rabiah the Infinite for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rabiah the Infinite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabiah the Infinite until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandstein 19:16, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MapCorondor 06.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MapCorondor 06.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:19, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MapNWJamuraa2.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MapNWJamuraa2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:39, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MapDominaria6.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MapDominaria6.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:11, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Magic: The Gathering characters: G for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Magic: The Gathering characters: G is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Magic: The Gathering characters: G until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. p b p 19:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Magic: The Gathering characters: H for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Magic: The Gathering characters: H is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Magic: The Gathering characters: H until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. p b p 19:31, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Magic: The Gathering characters: X for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Magic: The Gathering characters: X is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Magic: The Gathering characters: X until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. p b p 19:33, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Magic: The Gathering characters: Z for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Magic: The Gathering characters: Z is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Magic: The Gathering characters: Z until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. p b p 19:35, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Duskmantle, House of Shadow listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Duskmantle, House of Shadow. Since you had some involvement with the Duskmantle, House of Shadow redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk)

Sunhome, Fortress of the Legion listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sunhome, Fortress of the Legion. Since you had some involvement with the Sunhome, Fortress of the Legion redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 05:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Svogthos, the Restless Tomb listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Svogthos, the Restless Tomb. Since you had some involvement with the Svogthos, the Restless Tomb redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 05:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rosalie van Breemen

The article Rosalie van Breemen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 03:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hunter61. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]