User talk:Humanidk

Welcome!

Hello, Humanidk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. —C.Fred (talk) 23:59, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Growth of religion has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Growth of religion was changed by Humanidk (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930445 on 2015-08-23T23:53:45+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:53, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Muslim population growth, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Muslim population growth, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 00:14, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Muslim population growth. Please indicate specifically where either Huntington or Robinson attribute the population growth directly to belief in Allah, or do not add the passage to the article at all. —C.Fred (talk) 00:55, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no indication that this is a reliable source. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:13, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — MusikAnimal ^talk 22:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I request to unblock.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Humanidk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am sorry if i am careless, disrespect, cause trouble or life threaten some users in this website.

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers moderators should not punish newcomer who wants to contribute in a good manner and it said please.

people can use informal english during conversation. people can use freedom of speech with limitation in a nice manner.

i just wanted to contribute in topic that help people and topic in islam. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Ignore_all_rules

i realize this is my first account, my account came in this websote on august 23,2015, i didnt say simpleabd is my first account and i am sorry for misunderstanding.

about sockpuppet, i really do not mean to violate guideline and policy or destroy people or destroy the website in a bad manner but to contribute in this website and help people.

do not worry, i do not contribute in bad way or bad manner or may destroy this website or may destroy the life of Muslims and other people.

now, i am going to put a reliable information and nice detail if i contribute an information. an example is article in walking https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Walking. walking can also defined by moving at a regular pace by lifting and setting down each foot in turn,.

and i am going to make an example for topic in Islam in https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Jumu%27ah. It is obligatory for male Muslims to attend in Jumu'ah prayer, avoid own sect and treat all Muslims as brothers.source is http://islam1.org/khutub/Rules_of_Friday_Prayer_1.htm. the information is the practiced of most and all Muslims and it is practice of prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and it is in the Holy Quran and command of ALLAH the One God.

i admit we need to respect all human beings who want to be treated nice and it is in the article in human right. i try not to cause trouble in this website and i try to understand people. i try to improve my behavior and i do not create account anymore to destroy nice people or destroy this website in a bad manner.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 13:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I request to unblock.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Humanidk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was trying to improve this website in a nice manner. wiki:ignorerules. i have now victim of many declined unblock request. do not worry, i am fine, we are not fine if we spend too much time here. i didn't abuse multiple account, please we know the meaning of abuse. and every account i have in this website has only few edit and the few edit are just trying to contribute in this website in the good manner. the reason of bad multiple accounts is because of misunderstanding. some of my accounts have only 1 edit and they banned as sock. some of my accounts have only 1 edit to request an unblock and they banned as sock. it is ok whatever happen in any of my unblock request. we know that we are just trying to improve this website in a nice manner. i request to unblock because i read the guideline and policy which some moderator suggested me and i put an example of contribution in my previous unblock request.

Decline reason:

No. And because you have a history of making repeated unblock requests on your other accounts, I'm removing talk page access. NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:55, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.