User talk:Human087

Welcome!

Hello Human087! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Chongkian (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

April 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Selim I have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Selim I was changed by Human087 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917492 on 2023-04-20T05:23:44+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 18:59, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Human087 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to appeal the block placed on my account in 2023. I understand that my actions may have led to a block after I made an edit to an English-language article. I would like to explain the situation and request a reconsideration of the block.

1-I acknowledge that my edit may have violated Wikipedia's guidelines, either by not meeting content standards or by not following the appropriate procedures. If my edits were perceived as disruptive or in violation of Wikipedia's rules, I sincerely apologize. 2-I am committed to learning from this experience and adhering to Wikipedia’s content and behavioral guidelines moving forward. I will make sure to improve the quality of my edits, ensure neutrality, and engage with the community in a constructive manner. 3- I request that my account be unblocked. I would appreciate the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia again, following the community standards and guidelines more carefully. Thank you for considering my request. I am willing to work collaboratively and positively with the Wikipedia community. Human087 (talk) 17:36, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We do not considered chatbot-generated requests. GPTZero score: 100%. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Human087 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am hereby writing to appeal the block placed on my account in 2023. At the time, I was unaware of the violations I made in my edits, and I sincerely apologize for any problems caused. Now, I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia’s guidelines and am committed to following them more carefully in the future. Please, I would appreciate it if my account were unblocked so that this time I can contribute positively and constructively to the Wikipedia community. Thank you for your consideration.Human087 (talk) 17:58, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

ZeroGPT says this is 100% certain AI generated. 331dot (talk) 18:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Human087 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is sickening, just because someone writes with formality and eloquence these days, that does not mean that the text is AI-generated; definitely, the WIKIPEDIA AI detector needs to be updated to acknowledge principally humans with high literacy and intellectuality... The first time, I improved my words. The second one was made by me, and let's see what shows up this time, lol. Let me aTTenuatE my formality.

HI ADMINS. I am HEREBY writing to appeal because my Wikipedia account was blocked in 2023. I sincerely apologiSe for the situation; I didn’t realiSe I violated Wikipedia rules with my edits, and I’m sorry for any issues caused. After this period, I now understand how important it is to follow and respect Wikipedia’s rules, and I’ll adhere to all rules when editing here. Therefore, I’d really appreciate it if my account could be unblocked so I can contribute to the Wikipedia community. I am here to contribute in a positive way. I can explain any doubts to prove my GOOD INTENTIONS. THANKZzz lol Human087 (talk) 19:10, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a generic unblock request that could apply to any person in any situation. You've had three chances to write an unblock request that addresses the reason why you were blocked. Instead, you've made minor edits to an AI-generated unblock request. At some point, we need to say, "This isn't going anywhere. It's time to stop the time-wasting." NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

The first two unblock requests look to me exactly like AI generated text, and it has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with being written "with formality and eloquence"; on the contrary, the pompous and stilted AI style is the exact opposite of eloquence. JBW (talk) 23:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]