User talk:Huggingface.co

May 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at FP3 player, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 19:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@David Biddulph Without citing a reliable source? Huggingface^.co 12:26, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to FP3 player, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 19:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits have repeated those made to the same article by now blocked user MihaiPedia101, so you ought to read (re-read?) User talk:MihaiPedia101. - --David Biddulph (talk) 19:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Readed! Here is a fragment from User talk:MihaiPedia101:

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by introducing incorrect information, as you did with this edit to FP3 player.

Huggingface^.co 12:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reverse sentence program (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reverse sentence program and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:16, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huggingface.co! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:16, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. -- ferret (talk) 22:41, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]