User talk:Hua89

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

October 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Stargate SG-1 (season 2) was changed by Hua89 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931388 on 2012-10-17T02:01:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:01, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spoilers

I notice that you have been removing what you consider to be "spoilers" from articles.[1][2][3] Quite aside from the fact that none of the information can be considered spoilers as the episodes aired at least 11 years ago, removal contravenes WP:SPOILER, which quite clearly states "it is not acceptable to delete information from an article because you think it spoils the plot." Please do not remove such content again. -- AussieLegend (✉) 08:17, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Stargate SG-1 (season 2). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. -- AussieLegend (✉) 11:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:58, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing spoilers is disruptive

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Stargate SG-1 (season 5), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Please note the response to your dispute resolution request at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Stargate Season 1-5 All episodes. This administrator agrees with the assessment there: persistently removing information from article because you perceive it as "spoilers" is disruptive. —C.Fred (talk) 02:44, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I see you posted to me and my 'disruptive' editing. Did you happen to notice where I suggested that there be both a basic plot outline summary AND a detailed page for all the other information?

as it is done here: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Enemies_%28Stargate_SG-1%29

This way there is both types of information available. Lots and lots for those who have already seen it and want to know more AND basic plot summaries for those who don't want there show ruined.

I am not randomly vandalizing the articles, I am trying to make both sides happy. AussieLegend does not appear to want to listen to any other solutions, other than quoting policy to me. I hope that you can see the difference in what I'm proposing.

I have proposed this policy change in mediation and have found that more than a few people have this complaint as well. I do not see why it can't be both.

Thanks for your time Hua89 (talk) 03:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC) (copied here from User talk:C.Fred to consolidate discussion)[reply]

I see the difference in what you're proposing. However, at this point, it's a proposal. You made a few bold changes, and they were reverted. At that point, it's time to discuss the situation—and not keep making the same changes that go against both current policy and current consensus. —C.Fred (talk) 03:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Auto-Tune, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 13:02, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]