User talk:Hseenigpg

Welcome

Hello, Hseenigpg, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:31, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Content requires sources

As I told you on you on your IP talk page,

I have reverted your edits to Asif Ali as you have failed to provide reliably published sources for claims of his birth date (as is clearly noted in the message DO NOT ADD without providing reliable source with a reputation for editorial oversight. ). You have also been inserting personal information about Ali's child which is not appropriate - see WP:BLP and particularly WP:NPF.

Please stop inserting inappropriate content. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:31, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To further expound. Do not include a "number" for each film unless you also provide a source that specifically verifies for each and every number that that the film Y is Ali's #th film. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:30, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Asif Ali has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Asif Ali was changed by Hseenigpg (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928362 on 2015-07-24T10:23:23+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:23, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Asif Ali shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Continuing your edit wars from the IP, you are still inserting unsourced claims, claims that are completely inappropriate to anything other than a fansite {"superhits") and content sourced to Wikipedia mirrors {awardsandwinners}. Please stop. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 10:17, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In another article you are reinserting copy and paste copyright violations. [1]-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:59, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Asif Ali, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 20:03, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated addition of copyright material

Your addition to Nirnnayakam has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Material in question was copied from http://www.reviewtrove.com/category/online-reviews/nirnayakam/ Regards, Yamaguchi先生 22:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hseenigpg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have blocked from editing pages.please unblock me.i dont use unvalid references again. My current IP address is 178.162.216.30, and the blocked range is 178.162.128.0/17.

Decline reason:

It is not you who are blocked, this account is not blocked. It is your IP address that is blocked because that IP range has been used for serious disruption. You are free to edit using different IP address. I see no reason to grant you WP:IPBE. You'll have to use another IP address. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:00, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hseenigpg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

mycurrent IP address is 178.162.216.36, and the blocked range is 178.162.128.0/17. please unblock this ip adress from editing.i dont break any copyright issues further.please.in many other pages same kind of external links are used so i did.i have contributed many valid things.but i have unblocked due to a single fault.i dont repeat this again

Decline reason:

As has been explained already, you are not blocked personally; the range from which you edit is. A single IP within a range cannot be unblocked, and IPBE is only given in exceptional situations. Use another IP.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:35, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As I already explained to you, this block has nothing to do with you. The range is not blocked because of your edits. Some other people are using the same IP range for disruption. That has no connection with your copyright issues. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:42, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thrissivaperoor Kliptham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thrissivaperoor Kliptham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrissivaperoor Kliptham until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 14:03, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Thrissivaperoor Kliptham, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Nairspecht (talk) (work) 08:07, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Avarude Raavukal Film Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Avarude Raavukal Film Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kavi Uddheshichathu Theatre List.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kavi Uddheshichathu Theatre List.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:28, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hseenigpg. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Avarude Raavukal Film Poster.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Avarude Raavukal Film Poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 03:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]