User talk:Hrey90210

Welcome!

Hello, Hrey90210, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to David Lee Roth, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Kubigula (talk) 04:26, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Lol1235.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lol1235.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:08, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Aerial.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Aerial.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 12:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Joseph Popielarczyk

A tag has been placed on Joseph Popielarczyk, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall ^talk 14:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Joseph Popielarczyk

A tag has been placed on Joseph Popielarczyk, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Joseph Popielarczyk to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Mufka ^(user) ^(talk) ^(contribs) 21:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Popielarczyk

You have recently recreated or reposted material at Joseph Popielarczyk which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. --KFP (talk | contribs) 21:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Joseph Popielarczyk, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Mufka ^(user) ^(talk) ^(contribs) 22:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lol1235.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lol1235.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Core desat 22:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hrey.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hrey.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Core desat 22:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for repeatedly recreating deleted material and removing the speedy deletion tags. PLease feel free to treturn to editing after that point, but please make sure anything you write conforms with wikipedia's notability policy. Viridae ^Talk 03:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jeff2.jpg was vandalized, noting here. - cohesion 01:55, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Womaneatingchocolate.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Womaneatingchocolate.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Otr500 (talk) 12:35, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]