User talk:HouseofPi/Archive2007
User box creator with template
[edit]I noticed you made a userbox here are two useful userbox creators you might be interested in
- Userbox Creator with template - designed to easily generate Userboxes and has builtin template.
- Userbox Creator with template has religious image database - designed to easily generate Religious Userboxes and has builtin template.
Java7837 20:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Greeting
[edit]I saw you never had a proper greeting, even in your archives, so I gave you one. -PatPeter 18:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedian Category
[edit]Did you want to be added to Category:Gay Wikipedians? PatPeter did this.[1] Just checking whether that is okay with you. — coelacan — 23:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sure why not Pumapayam 05:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Cool. Another, different editor expressed a concern that Category:Cub Wikipedians might be accidentally misused by careless people who confuse Cub and Cub. I'm not sure how likely such confusion could be, but renaming the category to Category:Bear cub Wikipedians should allay this concern. What are your thoughts on such a renaming? — coelacan — 06:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- I support it, my Wikipedia skills are pretty amatuerish, so do you know how to do this? Pumapayam 15:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I will ask the other people in the category if they would be okay with renaming, and if so, I'll take care of it. — coelacan — 15:53, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- I support it, my Wikipedia skills are pretty amatuerish, so do you know how to do this? Pumapayam 15:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Cool. Another, different editor expressed a concern that Category:Cub Wikipedians might be accidentally misused by careless people who confuse Cub and Cub. I'm not sure how likely such confusion could be, but renaming the category to Category:Bear cub Wikipedians should allay this concern. What are your thoughts on such a renaming? — coelacan — 06:22, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
PlayStation Eye infobox
[edit]Damn, really sorry about that. I was going to put it in the comment textbox that I got it from the original article before I redirected it, but forgot. In no way did I want to make it look like it was my work. Sorry again. SynergyBlades 17:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Apology acceptedl :) Thank you. Pumapayam 17:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Image:Metrorail1.JPG listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Metrorail1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
PS3 Emotion Engine
[edit]Hi there. Newer 20GB and 60GB models do not have the Emotion Engine chip [2] [3]. Additionally, 'NONE' of the PAL consoles have an EE chip [4]. Please do not add this to the features table again. Thanks - ARC GrittTALK 20:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]What part of Texas do you live in? Do you work on any Texas-based Wikiprojects? --Davidstrauss 05:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Bolt2logo.JPG
[edit]![Image Copyright problem](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/35/Information_icon.svg/62px-Information_icon.svg.png)
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bolt2logo.JPG. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 20:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Bolt2logo.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bolt2logo.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shell babelfish 00:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:Playstationeye.jpg
[edit]![Replaceable fair use](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/32px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Playstationeye.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:47, 11 November 2007 (UTC)