User talk:Housecarpenter
Housecarpenter, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Housecarpenter! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC) |
+
[edit]Are you ever going to stop creating sock accounts? --Jennica✿ / talk 18:01, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- I love editing. You love destroying others' works (see Altan - 19,584 bytes deleted on 30 November 2016 in only one click only because it "does not seem notable"!?!). I hate your policing. You hate others' freedom to edit the way they do... What else to say? Yes! You're a pain in the ass! Get a(nother) life! Housecarpenter (talk) 19:25, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- well that's your opinion. my opinion is that you add unnecessary bulk that only a few select would want. it's unencyclopedic. we don't need a week by week itinerary on Altan's happenings. and I'm being civil with you. for you to call me a pain in the ass doesn't help anything. as long as you keep making accounts, I will make sure you get blocked. it's the wikipedia rules. I am not the only one who thinks your edits to articles are unnecessary bulk. I'm not the only one who has reverted your edits on the Malicorne or Altan pages. I'm willing to work with other editors even with opposing viewpoints but you don't seem to listen to anybody or care about improving things to wikipedia's standards. --Jennica✿ / talk 20:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- You seem to like very much the word "bulk". I think some wikipedia standards suck! And I'm not the only one to think that way... I think you don't care one minute about opposing viewpoints. That's the problem with people like you. As long as Wikipedia rules say so, you follow the rules! Go on, tell on me and keep on blocking me: you're pretty good as that! This has turned yet into a pretty exciting (and sometimes very boring) game of cat and mouse between you and me! There are mostly 2 kinds of people in this world: the likes of you who follow the rules, and the likes of me who question them. The concept of banishment disgust me. People like you supporting this concept and behaving like you do disgust me. For sure, you would have been the right person playing the kapo in a not-that-far past in some prison camp. This is the same silly blind dedication to one silly cause... By the way, I sometimes listen, but only when the rules are smart... Get a life! It's not necessarily too late for you! Housecarpenter (talk) 21:51, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- you are being unnecessarily harsh tbh. I am no kapo. I just think if you're blocked once, you shouldn't keep trying.
--Jennica✿ / talk 21:57, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Only in your dreams! I truly believe every single words I wrote... to be honest! Have a nice evening in Kentucky, fried chick...! Housecarpenter (talk) 22:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- I haven't personally insulted you so you doing it to me is pretty unwarranted
--Jennica✿ / talk 22:21, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- You "insulted" me or were harsh with me every time you reverted my work, told on me and succeeded in having me banned...! Housecarpenter (talk) 03:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- I haven't personally insulted you so you doing it to me is pretty unwarranted
- Only in your dreams! I truly believe every single words I wrote... to be honest! Have a nice evening in Kentucky, fried chick...! Housecarpenter (talk) 22:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Forget the rules, then, for a moment. What if the community just disagrees with your changes? --Fru1tbat (talk) 14:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- What community? Jennica is a community on her own? Housecarpenter (talk) 22:15, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- you are being unnecessarily harsh tbh. I am no kapo. I just think if you're blocked once, you shouldn't keep trying.
- You seem to like very much the word "bulk". I think some wikipedia standards suck! And I'm not the only one to think that way... I think you don't care one minute about opposing viewpoints. That's the problem with people like you. As long as Wikipedia rules say so, you follow the rules! Go on, tell on me and keep on blocking me: you're pretty good as that! This has turned yet into a pretty exciting (and sometimes very boring) game of cat and mouse between you and me! There are mostly 2 kinds of people in this world: the likes of you who follow the rules, and the likes of me who question them. The concept of banishment disgust me. People like you supporting this concept and behaving like you do disgust me. For sure, you would have been the right person playing the kapo in a not-that-far past in some prison camp. This is the same silly blind dedication to one silly cause... By the way, I sometimes listen, but only when the rules are smart... Get a life! It's not necessarily too late for you! Housecarpenter (talk) 21:51, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- well that's your opinion. my opinion is that you add unnecessary bulk that only a few select would want. it's unencyclopedic. we don't need a week by week itinerary on Altan's happenings. and I'm being civil with you. for you to call me a pain in the ass doesn't help anything. as long as you keep making accounts, I will make sure you get blocked. it's the wikipedia rules. I am not the only one who thinks your edits to articles are unnecessary bulk. I'm not the only one who has reverted your edits on the Malicorne or Altan pages. I'm willing to work with other editors even with opposing viewpoints but you don't seem to listen to anybody or care about improving things to wikipedia's standards. --Jennica✿ / talk 20:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Fru1tbat is right. And no, I don't have a community. I am not a community. I am following wikipedia rules. You are not by repeatedly signing back up for accounts when you've been blocked time and time again. --Jennica✿ / talk 12:22, 22 January 2017 (UTC)